From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH]:Resend: Add LLVM, clang and clang-runtime-3.8 to GNU Guix Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:42:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87mvmtxd7r.fsf@inria.fr> References: <87r3copogv.fsf@gnu.org> <5acf393a17d0ddf9ab4a92fbde9950dc@openmailbox.org> <87vb1yjj2u.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52529) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBOZo-0005Y9-PW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:42:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBOZm-0004F2-R8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:42:27 -0400 List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Dennis Mungai Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Guix-devel Hi Dennis, Dennis Mungai skribis: > I have made a few changes that should ensure a successful build of > both clang and clang-runtime-3.8, by disabling test units from llvm > 3.8 as they generated invalid targets for clang. What=E2=80=99s your opinion on this: > On 28 May 2016 at 18:30, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Another question: is there any use for all these versions, or should we >> instead just bump llvm/clang/clang-runtime to 3.8? >> >> LLVM 3.6 currently has only five users: >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> $ GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH=3D guix refresh -l llvm@3.6 >> Building the following 2 packages would ensure 5 dependent packages are = rebuilt: rdmd-v2.070.0-1.da0a2e0 c-reduce-2.3.0 >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- ? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.