From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: DMD
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:52:46 +0200
Message-ID: <87mvl4d8up.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20160725215327.GA16068@solar>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57843)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bRz2k-0004a9-Uf
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 05:52:55 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bRz2g-0005P0-3z
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 05:52:54 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160725215327.GA16068@solar> (Andreas Enge's message of "Mon,
	25 Jul 2016 23:53:27 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hi,

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> I just noticed that we still have a dmd package (that does not build on a=
rm).
> Should we not drop it now that we have the shepherd?

Yes, please do.

Ludo=E2=80=99.