From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Guile 2.0.13 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 22:13:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87mvi9mikz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8760oxpwsd.fsf@gnu.org> <20161012163542.GA32216@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40497) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buPuK-0006bR-Op for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:13:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buPuF-0006zK-FT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:13:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20161012163542.GA32216@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:35:42 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari skribis: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 02:38:26PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Given that core-updates with Guile 2.0.12 is on its way and that master >> is still at 2.0.11, I=E2=80=99d suggest to leave master as-is and focus = on >> core-updates. >>=20 >> There we have 2 options: >>=20 >> 1. Changing =E2=80=98guile-2.0/fixed=E2=80=99 to 2.0.13, but 1,310 pac= kages depend on it. >>=20 >> 2. Grafting 2.0.13, which is doable since 2.0.12 and .13 have the same= ABI. > > Considering that 2.0.13 fixes a bug that is exposed by grafting, That *was* exposed by grafting; commit d72267863382041b84a9712eea354882be72ef55 works around the problem, so that=E2=80=99s fine. > We could always un-graft it between releases if Hydra isn't busy. Yeah. I was thinking that we=E2=80=99d want to finish this core-updates cy= cle and then later do an ungrafting round or something. WDYT? Ludo=E2=80=99.