From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Back from the Reproducible Build Summit, 2nd edition
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 11:59:04 +0100
Message-ID: <87mvfto64n.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87k2ayslmi.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1gq6ux6.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35593)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cIZBO-0002oO-81
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 05:59:11 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cIZBL-0006MK-5a
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 05:59:10 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87d1gq6ux6.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Sat, 17
	Dec 2016 14:40:53 -0800")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hi Chris!

Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com> skribis:

> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:
>
>> Here=E2=80=99s a report from the 2nd Reproducible Build Summit that took=
 place
>> this week!
>>
>>   https://gnu.org/software/guix/news/reproducible-build-summit-2nd-editi=
on.html
>
> Thank you for sharing these notes.  I see you mentioned some follow-up
> tasks, like hopefully supporting the "k out of n" substitute policy by
> the next summit.  Are we tracking tasks like that somewhere?

I=E2=80=99m afraid we aren=E2=80=99t, but we should probably email them to
bug-guix@gnu.org and set the =E2=80=9Cwishlist=E2=80=9D flag on them, for i=
nstance.

Would you like to do that?  :-)

Cheers,
Ludo=E2=80=99.