From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [directory-discuss] guix tags that could be automatically
	extracted
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:08:00 +0200
Message-ID: <87mv835f7j.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87fudx6u4u.fsf@riseup.net>
	<dd66640b-38ab-4fac-12b6-d437a2db03d6@tobias.gr>
	<20170716120743.6bjezyufuxra5wji@abyayala>
	<08829de5-d4ed-a892-1202-1c815147e795@tobias.gr>
	<20170716150406.w5e7xecnvh2azdq2@abyayala>
	<87379w9s56.fsf@openmailbox.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53129)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1dX6gv-0000ki-D7
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:08:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1dX6gs-0000fQ-8F
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:08:05 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87379w9s56.fsf@openmailbox.org> (Adonay Felipe Nogueira's
	message of "Sun, 16 Jul 2017 15:02:45 -0300")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno@openmailbox.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hello,

Adonay Felipe Nogueira <adfeno@openmailbox.org> skribis:

> As I explained in directory-discuss, in the same thread that started
> this one: I'm in favor of:
>
> Guix =E2=86=92 FSF MW.
>
> But I don't think the other way around is good, as it might also imply
> losing the auto-sufficiency described in the first sections of the GNU
> FSDG.
>
> As far as I know, Quiliro's intention was to do the first (Guix =E2=86=92=
 FSF
> MW).

That=E2=80=99s something that should be easily done, maybe without even a s=
ingle
change on the Guix side: the output is in the GNU=C2=A0recutils format, so
perhaps it can be directly entered in the MediaWiki database somehow?

Anyway thanks for looking into this.  I think it=E2=80=99s good to share ef=
forts
among peers!

Ludo=E2=80=99.