From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: 03/09: gnu: util-linux: Update to 2.30.1.
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 23:59:40 +0200
Message-ID: <87mv6agm5v.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20170902135826.20582.25978@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
	<20170902135830.43E0F2044A@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
	<87pob8x23p.fsf@gnu.org> <87mv6ajmt2.fsf@fastmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51163)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1dozPH-00009s-05
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 17:59:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1dozPC-0002nM-GD
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 17:59:47 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87mv6ajmt2.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Mon, 04
	Sep 2017 21:17:29 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> skribis:

> Adding 'dbus' gives 1988 and 'util-linux' 2171, so it's not a huge
> difference.  Is it still worth dropping the 300-500 extra rebuilds?

Well, maybe not after all, it=E2=80=99s hard to tell.  I guess we=E2=80=99d=
 need more
sophisticated ways to estimate the cost of updates.

Is anyone looking for a PhD topic?  :-)

Ludo=E2=80=99.