From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: 01/01: gnu: cmake: Delete Emacs library.
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 11:41:39 +0200
Message-ID: <87muwk2k30.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20180522141738.8231.26687@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
	<20180522141741.641D120711@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
	<87d0xn7cqt.fsf@netris.org> <87y3ga9wty.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87sh6h6dk7.fsf@netris.org> <87k1rsxdbg.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87y3g6edxd.fsf@fastmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34242)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1fNEew-00005e-5u
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2018 05:41:46 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1fNEer-0003kp-MA
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2018 05:41:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87y3g6edxd.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Sat, 26
	May 2018 15:37:02 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hello Marius & all,

Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> skribis:

> Good idea.  It would be good to clarify that this also applies for
> 'staging'.  What do you think about this instead?
>
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> doc/contributing.texi | 11 +++++++++--

The patch LGTM!

> +@c TODO: It would be good with badges on the website that tracks these
> +@c branches.  Or maybe even a status page.

I agree!  I admit I sometimes have a hard time determining the current
status of every branch (for instance I=E2=80=99m not sure what=E2=80=99s up=
 with
=E2=80=98staging=E2=80=99 at the moment=E2=80=A6)

Perhaps a lo-tech thing would be to have more frequent reminders on the
mailing list of the status of each branch, also as a way to solicitate
contributions on these branches.

I really think we need to have someone responsible for those rebuild
cycles, and to arrange to hand over reponsibilities to a different
person after each cycle or so.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.