From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur <clement@lassieur.org>
Subject: Re: IRC freenode issue
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 17:11:34 +0200
Message-ID: <87muu4erbt.fsf@lassieur.org>
References: <87o9ekex8d.fsf@lassieur.org> <87a7q4x2av.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44784)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <clement@lassieur.org>) id 1flFGR-0005X2-K6
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2018 11:11:45 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <clement@lassieur.org>) id 1flFGM-00089A-HL
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2018 11:11:43 -0400
In-reply-to: <87a7q4x2av.fsf@netris.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>

Hi Mark,

Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:

> Hi Cl=C3=A9ment,
>
> Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur <clement@lassieur.org> writes:
>
>> There seems to be an issue with #guix: I can't join anymore.  The error
>> is:
>>
>>   Cannot join channel (+i) - you must be invited=20
>>
>> I think it also happens to other people (ng0, marusich).
>
> Sorry, this was my mistake.  I typed the wrong command while trying to
> give ops privileges to Ricardo.  It seems to be fixed now.
>
>       Mark

Anyway it's fixed, and it's better than before because we got rid of the
spammers.  Thank you all!

Cl=C3=A9ment