From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [bug#32871] Ruby 2.5, pushing to staging?
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:05:40 +0200
Message-ID: <87murfk2aj.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87in2g0zlm.fsf@cbaines.net> <87d0se6f37.fsf@cbaines.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51020)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1gByoq-000253-MO
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 05:05:45 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1gByoo-0000AW-Jt
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 05:05:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87d0se6f37.fsf@cbaines.net> (Christopher Baines's message of
	"Fri, 12 Oct 2018 22:16:12 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 32871@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Chris,

Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> skribis:

> Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> writes:
>
>> A new minor version of Ruby has been out for a while, and it would be
>> good to get Ruby 2.5 in to Guix.
>>
>> I've put up a patch here [1], and tried it locally. I've pushed some
>> fixes to master to make some packages compatible [2], and while I do get
>> some failures when building the 958 (according to guix refresh -l)
>> dependant packages, I'm unsure how many of these are down to the Ruby
>> upgrade.
>>
>> 1: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D32871
>> 2: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D32870
>>
>> Anyway, looking at the contributing guide this is possibly too big of a
>> change to push directly to master, so should I push this to the staging
>> branch?
>
> I've now gone ahead and pushed to staging. Not really sure what happens
> now.... will berlin and hydra pick this up automatically, and start
> building packages?

Not yet!  Primarily because we=E2=80=99re focusing (or trying to=E2=80=A6) =
on building
core-updates so we can get it merged soonish, after which we can
hopefully merge staging.

Thanks!

Ludo=E2=80=99.