From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Move Clojure and Femtolisp Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 14:30:58 +0100 Message-ID: <87mupz7wfh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87in0op2nh.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46941) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gQBYD-0007tF-TB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 08:31:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gQBYC-0002Bb-SX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 08:31:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87in0op2nh.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of "Fri, 23 Nov 2018 10:24:34 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: Guix-devel Hello! Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > I've noticed that Femtolisp and Clojure are part of lisp.scm. > In my opinion Femtolisp should belong to scheme.scm, while Clojure > should probably end up in a separate clojure.scm file. > > Thoughts? No opinion here. What do Andy Patterson and Alex Vong think? :-) Ludo=E2=80=99.