From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: Status update on 1.0 Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 17:11:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87muld8xuo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871s3a4xd4.fsf@gnu.org> <87wokjyuw4.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58678) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h9u65-0001vh-LS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:11:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wokjyuw4.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:46:03 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: Guix-devel Hi! Marius Bakke skribis: > I don't think we should release 1.0 until at least > and are > fixed. Trying a new distribution only to find your favourite programs > are crashing would be a _terrible_ first impression. Do we have any leads on this IceCat issue? I use IceCat daily and never have any problems of this sort, FWIW. > Personally I would like to include the latest GNOME as well as the GCC7 > branch for bells *and* whistles. But that's still a few months off... Ideally I=E2=80=99d like to release by the end of April. It=E2=80=99d take= more time if we were to wait for the =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 merge; but that=E2= =80=99s OK: there=E2=80=99ll be a 1.0.1 or 1.1 release, too. :-) The GNOME branch may be mergeable on time, along with =E2=80=98staging=E2= =80=99. Ricardo? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.