From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: Packaging Jami progress Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 17:28:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87muc6ag9w.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <20191104214754.793ec2ff@interia.pl> <20191126203259.0f4141ea@kompiuter> <20191130192121.11e0c968@kompiuter> <87fti52or5.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191201173411.042e68f2@kompiuter> <878snw2bpn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191203164402.77a8c728@interia.pl> <87tv6hieeg.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191203190235.53765cba@kompiuter> <87fti1mf1u.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87d0d5mez0.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191204153631.509b9afb@interia.pl> <87immwt8kh.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191204165038.7a5403f2@interia.pl> <87fti0t6rr.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191204175614.29f663cd@kompiuter> <87a788t47g.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191204182249.38fd0700@interia.pl> <87wobac07c.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191205170016.7530c813@kompiuter> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52668) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ictzG-0007OO-6E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 11:28:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ictzE-0002f9-Ku for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 11:28:17 -0500 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:50427) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ictzE-0002Od-B7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 11:28:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20191205170016.7530c813@kompiuter> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Jan Cc: Guix-devel --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jan writes: > Jami developers apply many patches for different projects - > currently our package code only patches pjproject, but ffmpeg needs > patches for instance for auto bitrate support and I don't really know > what has to be patched next - I listed the output of "find -name > "*.patch"" in the first mail. > I think copying and pasting similar code from pjproject package > definition to ffmpeg definition isn't a good practice, that's why I > decided to create a procedure taking patches from > ring-project/daemon/contrib/ and applying them. OK I get it now, thanks! You are right, it's a good idea to have such a procedure then. =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl3pMBsACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH8Magf/ZmYNWp4ZuosMe9CJxQJTPCVWNekaByyvAmb0Yj/Lvw/OtMLQmoWKYFFj 3k7UCNWb4DY1makFly1MM35eN6edkhYfOq6wvg7jjV9TyTtvSiRRJNvQfjQyt7hF KcodkujTwZA4+ya7QEd5RPl3wkAm/608Ja9SVc8IjlzF6uaCeehrBMkFWpiY1XOa ndmF53uMxvNd8EH+m87gEYhwFgkevV3vHMTF+5yKYlQbsLv1NXcFMw1lFqGcD+HZ Xe8ds1pVLdNPrJ1FfMX/jRA2WXwtIGVFgsWkNfdMeEiB9f388DnunHjvPsH5hhVp piO0iJiec8LScUq5/XgzNIhNOM16aw== =L8G7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--