From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id UcRCO7bNUF96ewAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 11:04:22 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id YESiNrbNUF/RDQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 11:04:22 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 984399404CF for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:04:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40274 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDn2T-0008PD-AH for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 07:04:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDmyM-00024i-U9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 07:00:06 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34965) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDmyL-0004qM-Kt; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 07:00:05 -0400 Received: from [2001:980:1b4f:1:42d2:832d:bb59:862] (port=47600 helo=dundal.janneke.lilypond.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kDmyJ-0006Xy-EM; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 07:00:04 -0400 From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: Messed up with (guix ssh) Organization: AvatarAcademy.nl References: <878sdr18kw.fsf@gnu.org> X-Url: http://AvatarAcademy.nl Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 12:59:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: <878sdr18kw.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Thu, 03 Sep 2020 12:02:55 +0200") Message-ID: <87mu276s7r.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix-devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: hT3N5urozuKW Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: Hello! > So I wanted to give a heads-up and apologize. It got me thinking; this > patch hadn=E2=80=99t gone through guix-patches, which could have prevente= d this, > maybe. Thanks for the heads-up and quick fix. I'm often amazed how well guix-patches work, notably also for catching/preventing silly mistakes. I think it's a trade-off and not all black and white, to get a feel for where the boundary is we have to cross it now and then. Dunno, very happy with what you're doing :-) Janneke --=20 Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.com