From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id JN1rJSM3pF+/bQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 17:32:19 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id iDDHICM3pF9YGgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 17:32:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A5709400EF for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 17:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58098 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kaj7S-0004So-8P for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 12:32:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57554) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kaj2S-0000kq-09 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 12:27:08 -0500 Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:45960) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kaj2P-0001Xu-Cg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 12:27:07 -0500 Received: from twig (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dustycloud.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C88AD266C1; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 12:26:35 -0500 (EST) References: <87tuuixjno.fsf@gmail.com> <87zh3w5ytp.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87wnz05u7d.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87tuu46tqm.fsf@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Christopher Lemmer Webber To: Miguel =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81ngel?= Arruga Vivas Subject: Re: [PATCH] Automatically set `geiser-guile-load-path' from .dir-locals In-reply-to: <87tuu46tqm.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 12:26:08 -0500 Message-ID: <87mtzv67gv.fsf@dustycloud.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=50.116.34.160; envelope-from=cwebber@dustycloud.org; helo=dustycloud.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/05 12:27:00 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: 6wWGwmA6mhcJ Miguel =C3=81ngel Arruga Vivas writes: > Hi Christopher, > > First of all I want to say sorry: I've tested this and reviewed the > patch, and this is the second issue that already has caused, so yes, my > tests weren't enough at all. > > Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > >> Also, I hope this email isn't interpreted as being dismissive or negative >> about what looks like it's probably a real usability improvement for >> hacking on Guix! I just thought my experience indicated maybe there are >> additional considerations to address. > > At least from my side I see your report as something positive, I cannot > see how could it be negative at all, and I'd like to thank you for it. Thanks. I don't have time to fully respond inline to your comments right now, but I appreciate the emails and work of both you and Maxim. Thank you both, and glad we haven't had a miscommunication where we mistakenly thought we were at odds. :)