From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id uNXGCiu7/V8eTgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:07:23 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id YAqoBiu7/V92fQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:07:23 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CC189404FF for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58228 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzLGT-0002k8-6Y for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:07:21 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57912) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzLCA-0006rZ-Os for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:02:55 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:60320) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzLC7-0006wZ-Cw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 10:02:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018; bh=KeC9vb2H3QfoBMSK22dw1VgDvrH6FA4pobaCDMmOPnI=; h=date:in-reply-to: references:subject:cc:to:from; b=RoUk3odX7QVeBvf369jMjUNAETTezoYk0TZO+ kyCMQTLTQHiP6DxD9MYgA58dQfjmZV0JDQIkDNz3Zce1CdjQyr6LlpE1oX4lXCkwB9FVSG czS19aqTONogiWPwOG6VATy1Hx0RWTLGL0S9wZreCiVGxeJU1ytNESvZm119g73Sus2jE0 y+iYc2JiqGHkktmVL4rt6diMDhNWmfX8DQh6UZuXiGxQYeN40751BickS1F0eqRv9b5JBu gNoeoCpp9wYvc1DCvfJ2up+KM4MTcftGcD/dZVY23nMAVUCWEGtDNeExv8bkfN1J7Yv+kJ k4XIF22lbg1UqOrfsWuemKySw== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 2578d600 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:03:20 +0000 (UTC) BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: John Soo Subject: Re: Emacs-Guix repository location moved to Savannah References: <871rer5xxv.fsf@asu.edu> <87pn2ao2hl.fsf@nckx> <87k0si445c.fsf@asu.edu> In-reply-to: <87k0si445c.fsf@asu.edu> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 16:02:46 +0100 Message-ID: <87mtxenqp5.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.66 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=RoUk3odX; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=tobias.gr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 6CC189404FF X-Spam-Score: -4.66 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: Utq49WlPU6z4 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable John Soo =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Does it still not start? As of (guix) commit > f98e3adcd533a4a4c5482343a26d01076e946f92 I at least can start a=20 > repl > without a crash. Good to know. I'll try again and let you know. >> Where do you accept patches? The one below is untested. > > That's also a good question. I would prefer to use the existing > guix-patches. Is that ok by the standard mailing list=20 > administrators? I can't think of a better place nor can I imagine we'll be=20 overwhelmed by emacs-guix patches. (And if we are, that's probably a good thing at this point?) > As to the patch, I would like to apply it. Is Guix System still=20 > the > preferred name? Yep. There's also no separate =E2=80=98System=E2=80=99 logo anymore[0]. G= uix=20 System being merely a different earthly manifestation of the one=20 eternal Guix. > I thought another renaming took place. I am possibly > very out of date on that info though. Nope. Kind regards, T G-R [0]: http://guix.gnu.org/en/graphics/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX/26Fg0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15z5EBAOftwrUG5BV1EjBGmKMJQm8NayXc7F80vsh8fxWe gVzFAQDEG3TzROVJs7nD9Nw7kK4S+oR+hzamsKnPdNOvQ1hgBQ== =n+UB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--