From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id EMkCEMcREmPeeQAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 16:23:03 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id qC38D8cREmMYWwEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 16:23:03 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCCFC3F7C3 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 16:23:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47056 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oU7ZV-0000Up-KV for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 10:23:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56294) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oU7T5-0004nu-GT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 10:16:23 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56456) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oU7T5-0000UK-13; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 10:16:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=/+FsgH3sSqiai91XuuOTn4k/GgIOsmidklNpmV3HhVA=; b=AzmvM0TEdrCZ6mw8F1CR bqRfvGSEEz0vWGrpKALs6B3ZIohcHCidyy3fm2YMI04Qm0/KNlDH17UekZONZG05KmW8hV/2d1H/x qGskTqVIIw6f7mkUI/YvrrVRAgmyePfwMA1UNf7MeDPgeEj1Ott3xHJ5vMc00frmOf9Zr+J2b98iT 8DFB20bxLhzD9ebIleStnfHCkVAe27Mb9j9QFR8zbVacgcV9gJIHSZWm5ZdhDN84PUdADYQ+5KvdP 1kURsw0KyPDXAzU67Zr/UR5k3x9Tozr7pDNnjLDyjszbBcKgbpB3q+06JGwcSVVX3g9E9BjA1n11k TUcFDORwRjsdMA==; Received: from [193.50.110.177] (port=35830 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oU7T4-0001iB-KP; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 10:16:22 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: okay to merge rekados-rust-queue branch? References: <87czchv4o4.fsf@elephly.net> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Sextidi 16 Fructidor an 230 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9v?= =?utf-8?Q?olution=2C?= jour du Citron X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 16:16:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87czchv4o4.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Tue, 30 Aug 2022 22:41:52 +0200") Message-ID: <87mtbhvp3f.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1662128582; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=/+FsgH3sSqiai91XuuOTn4k/GgIOsmidklNpmV3HhVA=; b=Cq9rQh8YR8M+z/RGSZ9HbZcge2KJpSC8X5afVG6N4nz+Q/ProodmGRzrmgH8p8UUIDajGp eS7Dzi5rVH8A06ZdRrLK69IXUTGdaNtBOfBw9jBNWM/ibZ4G6CeqNs8bpDgnQpSIx8EJTn mwHUhwKGmFGzJXn+xykCzRO6o661FFBb2/nnYH61N2iWB0OHBM4VEAMoHNKM6yP7QXAN0R 2neRW8F5PI1WyMGHqQ791kTjPWYJF/GRc5nDW2UWURwxjqYMWAu9Jh0z7mGobNmCDeEoo4 EAl2E1dPFoAlCP1NPblm4QDvP44YxXgJWsWcT5pWXiHTh0a0v3aiWQLdsMjcmA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1662128582; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=jbl37BpOlrg4sMuc1qEXA2ebGa/ZsY49DVQQuzflcOwOTKrQyGpWjVxO19MKspoQ5M/Ueu Ql+bo5vwJdDBiBgoFJDPUnGMqMs3fl0SfV6unKhAGWEiMDK28yF+W6/k8zUHMam3R2Nyti i7R6uqwpYWJbMJyMig6LeLbhMMGzqj6A3HHhtSKrOgtSr1chFjpPeow622x+BdI3kqHMEP xWlHB+S7XP/Lerp6nLZGbX+Mau46SoyWDTAosWQ0UEp20WwgY+epCBV8Y+Gjs1HHtAynsW drV88fqlGLHqhyF0PMdIBub5Upli7gDsy/IftKZ09zgRhkLJe7SalBy1w4T/1A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=AzmvM0TE; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.47 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=AzmvM0TE; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: DCCFC3F7C3 X-Spam-Score: -2.47 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: ZOD1o0/YOJEZ Hi, Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > I have a small branch with minor Rust package upgrades. I successfully > built icecat on that branch and the failing rust-* packages seen in the > latest builds at https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/rekados-rust-queue seem > to be broken on the master branch as well. > > Would it be okay to merge this branch? > > I=E2=80=99m asking because the cargo-build-system makes it difficult to s= ee how > upgrades affect other packages, so building things on ci.guix.gnu.org > and locally is the only way I can verify that the changes aren=E2=80=99t > catastrophic. > > I=E2=80=99d like to merge this soon while the successful builds are fresh. I guess that as long as there are no big regressions on ci.guix compared to the starting point in =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99, that should be fine. Normally we should be able to compare the status of both branches with: https://data.guix.gnu.org/compare?base_commit=3Db594c7354ce1daedecb3310b5= 5817b69e90adbe9&target_commit=3D9ea5ebb9b1f393abba81e90d33ccc0da97f47032&lo= cale=3Den_US.UTF-8 However, it seems that data.guix hasn=E2=80=99t processed the new branch. Ludo=E2=80=99.