unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* Doing away with CentOS 6 support (Linux faux-2.6)?
@ 2023-12-07 22:46 Ludovic Courtès
  2023-12-08  1:10 ` Ricardo
  2023-12-08 16:54 ` Simon Tournier
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2023-12-07 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: guix-devel, guix-science; +Cc: Ricardo Wurmus

Hello Guix!

We’ve been carrying a libc patch that allows us to potentially run
binaries on systems running the CentOS 6 kernel—a heavily-patched Linux
2.6 that resembles 3.0 but identifies itself as 2.6.32.

  https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/patches/glibc-allow-kernel-2.6.32.patch

Back in 2018, this was deemed important for HPC clusters, where CentOS 6
was then relatively common, as Ricardo explained:

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2018-02/msg00392.html

Five years later, it seems reasonable to drop the patch (which is likely
untested these days).  If you disagree, now’s the time to make your
voice heard!

With the upcoming glibc upgrade in the ‘core-updates’ branch¹, glibc
would require Linux >= 3.2.0, as is already the case on ‘master’ if we
omit this faux-2.6.32 exception.

It’s still weeks, or perhaps months, before ‘core-updates’ is merged,
but the sooner we discuss this, the better!

Ludo’.

¹ https://issues.guix.gnu.org/67686


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Doing away with CentOS 6 support (Linux faux-2.6)?
  2023-12-07 22:46 Doing away with CentOS 6 support (Linux faux-2.6)? Ludovic Courtès
@ 2023-12-08  1:10 ` Ricardo
  2023-12-08 16:54 ` Simon Tournier
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo @ 2023-12-08  1:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: guix-devel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 309 bytes --]

Hi,

On 8 December 2023 06:46:50 GMT+08:00, "Ludovic Courtès" <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr> wrote:

>Five years later, it seems reasonable to drop the patch (which is likely
>untested these days).  If you disagree, now’s the time to make your
>voice heard!


I agree that it's time to drop the patch.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 357 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Doing away with CentOS 6 support (Linux faux-2.6)?
  2023-12-07 22:46 Doing away with CentOS 6 support (Linux faux-2.6)? Ludovic Courtès
  2023-12-08  1:10 ` Ricardo
@ 2023-12-08 16:54 ` Simon Tournier
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Simon Tournier @ 2023-12-08 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ludovic Courtès, guix-devel, guix-science; +Cc: Ricardo Wurmus

Hi,

On Thu, 07 Dec 2023 at 23:46, Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr> wrote:

> Back in 2018, this was deemed important for HPC clusters, where CentOS 6
> was then relatively common, as Ricardo explained:

Héhé!  A colleague re-installed CentOS 6 this week; for testing
purpose.  Hum… :-)

> Five years later, it seems reasonable to drop the patch (which is likely
> untested these days).  If you disagree, now’s the time to make your
> voice heard!

Yeah, let drop this patch.  Well, CentOS 7 will be soon end of life so
it seems very reasonable to drop patches for CentOS 6 only.

Cheers,
simon



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-08 17:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-12-07 22:46 Doing away with CentOS 6 support (Linux faux-2.6)? Ludovic Courtès
2023-12-08  1:10 ` Ricardo
2023-12-08 16:54 ` Simon Tournier

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).