From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id sML+MxJnyWV8RQAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 01:32:19 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id sML+MxJnyWV8RQAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 01:32:18 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=retrospec.tv header.s=fm2 header.b=CvTMZCxo; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b="W YRKlDj"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1707697938; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=1CVq+Rrg7s38p4EDRr1DDqYpUlCjVvZ1VeTUvJa9d5s=; b=kxIeJhcjqV2oG+VmkZd1Y+bb7L3LjrnH+/x9kfgtsL3Gy3YWwyMyD6eagrQuMDCt38ngTL R8BexIfV0YPwuAx6sjliMz/U388UY1Yh516GQyZtRE4B/GNkKCZTLIM/3pPn2gWBtGwrcP vKnPym9YEPfPDyCckLIJte6hBEaIGCZ2pLnu6cWg6KpUv400cm+sdl8Adr/gygo4/TiXVY i1Fx4oaKTi9trNC4Ty/LTcqGesmVYPDRoTDMmYs2R2TUQcVUNzKVr/099EFV3ApTlwR7no BpFWggf6TioFsnV/UEDW44t2lMkz4k5WxwX8lSsNormfPLkhXfqnUaSqgjGpRA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=retrospec.tv header.s=fm2 header.b=CvTMZCxo; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b="W YRKlDj"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1707697938; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=W2vjfznGjJ7YokV5r9jo3yVYdlGkiolhsKmCvnDLTek7H+BlS8xc8+SFw3URD9WiCRZT+Z Z0d0KJfCmVmqNyApi0Yeop1I3vcIfhthN4pMTFcMh2ij0UvzfHIZp3p9ZqC+TZJvrVcTmO NGJN4scpKCG70mwOYHrX0/k4gJsx79eRxT7lH9Vok7sz94lN05gemUv4vKy/Mt7YCOi6X1 yJyiH/sGLkmyGVSOv2vRL17CKKOZD4KOTyzL2MLXgfXQjc56973T2itNfgFV+lrcUfV322 rJOcyLHZvh2LcNtp94Cr+WukG3KR0PkerUPfG+ZUPLlx8eoRMOsjfBV1HYjKtw== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EA8A6CBC5 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 01:32:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rZKEP-0000bK-Gg; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 19:31:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rZKEN-0000bC-6j for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 19:31:31 -0500 Received: from fhigh7-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.158]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rZKEL-0005O2-0t for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 19:31:30 -0500 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AED9114008C for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 19:31:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 11 Feb 2024 19:31:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=retrospec.tv; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date:date :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1707697885; x=1707784285; bh=1CVq+Rrg7s38p4EDRr1DDqYpUlCjVvZ1VeTUvJa9d5s=; b= CvTMZCxoW/APiUpq+8NXgjpdjJiRMwyvpgYE2gUfGh96XYmvU3E+Cn83f7t/2o2I 3TaF26m3C+4N1K0VLmjbmbeL0HGZa4pj3bMBTHBKahhMWQ29+wWtWzV2om/pi0XK pBKhrWF1Yv3KTyQU4CuUkYX/ZrpdexO2EEQFA7KhAIJGFmnMirnwyt/0d2VzUw3R LscPfVkXC03gSCSN3hNLWqK8fMHQVnhOScxTvI3fwLUK55v5XvWIe0NCy+RgBdV1 0349Kmn2WlN2XWdIiIDT3/3gbQ/7Uj6JxqYXX3SqvQNGC5xqV4EINO9210zZ5ib/ BjfbMXZGP8DCnvdORYn01A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1707697885; x= 1707784285; bh=1CVq+Rrg7s38p4EDRr1DDqYpUlCjVvZ1VeTUvJa9d5s=; b=W YRKlDjQcYYwgoCGKxos+s0bCX5dF9CuawyfBtDG8Lj1Xo2zP46DnnSUz4R8HOxmQ mTc0XK+EKdNLnDguaVkNqMpyKGJMlncicq3GIL7rW5h3oqUVFGDQhCxfaWjeXv+3 PDej3xNu7evwyoVJ3GCaBlKS6yj64F61mgQmWThADSoF+b0s75x6tQZ0TJnncsiw ryMiK1P6rzDCA0tTvjXLYrgo40MWqjAxXzUwgSOUL7ylpLVrz+93IFKbqQLjCJq/ 25DDEfPcMtVX25vPB6N/XnX0+n4uQy+AqyP/uaNUeWkOi5zn/+GZ1XWGJ+vyr3s6 i8iiVT7hDt1QqBu8AVD4g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledruddvgddvfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfhgfhffvufffjgfkgggtgfesthhqre dttderjeenucfhrhhomhepkfgrnhcugfhurhgvuceoihgrnhesrhgvthhrohhsphgvtgdr thhvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffieegvdfgueevjeevkeeugefftefhhefhveefge ehgeetheektedujeegveegfeenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghenucevlhhushht vghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehirghnsehrvghtrhhosh hpvggtrdhtvh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: id9014242:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 19:31:24 -0500 (EST) References: <87wmrddheu.fsf@cbaines.net> User-agent: mu4e 1.8.13; emacs 28.2 From: Ian Eure To: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: QA is back, who wants to review patches? Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 16:21:29 -0800 In-reply-to: <87wmrddheu.fsf@cbaines.net> Message-ID: <87mss6y143.fsf@retrospec.tv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=103.168.172.158; envelope-from=ian@retrospec.tv; helo=fhigh7-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.84 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 7EA8A6CBC5 X-Spam-Score: -5.84 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: Yn5mmR+FROQQ Christopher Baines writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > Hey! > > After substitute availability taking a bit of a dive recently,=20 > the > bordeaux build farm has finally caught back up and QA is back=20 > submitting > builds for packages changed by patches. > > QA also has a feature to allow easily tagging patches (issues)=20 > as having > been reviewed and ready to merge (reviewed-looks-good). You can=20 > do this > via sending an email and QA has a form ("Mark patches as=20 > reviewed") on > the page for each issue to help you do this. > > I'd encourage anyone and everyone to review patches, there's no=20 > burden > on you to spot every problem and you don't need any special > knowledge. You just need to not be involved (so you can't review=20 > your > own patches) and take a good look at the changes, mentioning any > questions that you have or problems that you spot. If you think=20 > the > changes look good to be merged, you can tag the issue=20 > accordingly. > > When issues are tagged as reviewed-looks-good, QA will display=20 > them in > dark green at the top of the list of patches, so it's on those=20 > with > commit access to prioritise looking at these issues and merging=20 > the > patches if indeed they are ready. > > Let me know if you have any comments or questions! > Wanted to check things out, but it=E2=80=99s giving the same error message= =20 on every page: An error occurred Sorry about that! misc-error #fvector->list: expected vector, got ~S#f#f Also, the certificate for issues.guix.gnu.org expired today. Is there a plan to improve the reliability Guix infrastructure?=20 It seems like major things break with alarming regularity. =E2=80=94 Ian