From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Improve search path handling? Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:27:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87lhjf92aq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ioes9hyi.fsf@fsf.org> <878ufmadyq.fsf@fsf.org> <87bnkfpcem.fsf@gnu.org> <87wq326iy8.fsf@fsf.org> <20150228203632.GB16886@debian> <87d24r2aac.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52265) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSMdv-0006AT-JX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 04:28:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSMds-0002xy-E5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 04:28:03 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55128) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSMds-0002xu-BR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 04:28:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87d24r2aac.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Mon, 02 Mar 2015 01:17:15 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver , Dave Thompson Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Mark H Weaver skribis: > Andreas Enge writes: > >> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 12:31:59PM -0500, David Thompson wrote: >>> Yes, I think so. I think I have resolved this, but it's a "rebuild the >>> world" change so I don't yet know if it works. Would it be possible to >>> add a 'wip-search-paths' branch for Hydra to build? >> >> Definitely! If you create and push such a branch, we can make it build on >> hydra. But maybe now is the moment to push lots of stuff to core-updates >> anyway (except that there have been so many changes recently, that I wor= ry >> if anything breaks, it will be difficult to determine why). > > I think we should just push this to 'core-updates' ASAP. I was about to enable whole-system builds for =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80= =99. David, do you want to try anyway or can you wait for the next round (which I=E2=80=99ll expect will be soon, because there=E2=80=99s another bu= nch of core changes I=E2=80=99d like to make)? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.