From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Lirzin Subject: Re: [PATCH] xscreenshot and imagefile Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:10:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87lhdy57ud.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: <87a8uf2c94.fsf@netris.org> <87oaiue4hh.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60378) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKjtS-0006XS-Nu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 05:12:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKjtO-0001sy-21 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 05:12:50 -0400 Received: from smtp16.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.50]:41270) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKjtN-0001sV-Pd for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 05:12:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87oaiue4hh.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Wed, 29 Jul 2015 22:58:18 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Orchidaceae Phalaenopsis Mark H Weaver writes: > Do other people think that such programs belong in Guix? IMO if it's free software, builds correctly, and doesn't fail at the execution, It's OK to have them in Guix because even if it's not maintained or seems useless. Maybe when Guix will achieve the beta stage and/or have too many packages :), things will have to be reconsidered. But fornow I think it's always good to have newcomers packaging stuff. -- Mathieu Lirzin