From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: 03/06: gnu: Add ruby-simplecov-html. Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 21:50:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87lhae6c3w.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20151102134710.25656.54602@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <874mh2c0yc.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55877) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtiXz-00024B-Q3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 15:51:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtiXw-0005Ll-KC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 15:51:15 -0500 Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:25534) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtiXw-0005LB-Bt for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 15:51:12 -0500 In-reply-to: <874mh2c0yc.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Mark H Weaver writes: > This build failed on all 4 architectures: > > http://hydra.gnu.org/eval/107751#tabs-new > > The reason is that the .gem file doesn't have the expected sha256sum, > e.g. see the error message here: > > http://hydra.gnu.org/build/764006 > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > Failed: output path > `/gnu/store/1wcr8krcldwg479fklxqshpb113xghbz-simplecov-html-0.10.0.gem' > should have sha256 hash > `1m5mprppw0xcrv2mkim5zsk70v089ajzqiq5hpyb0xg96fcyzyxj', instead has > `1qni8g0xxglkx25w54qcfbi4wjkpvmb28cb7rj5zk3iqynjcdrqf' > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- How odd! It’s only been a couple of weeks between packaging it and pushing the commit. Changing tarballs/gems in place is bad. I’ll take a look at this soon and update the recipe if the change is harmless. Thanks for letting me know! ~~ Ricardo