From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Add pixz. Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:22:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87lh7et6e7.fsf@elephly.net> References: <56A552EA.2040703@uq.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33686) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNcR3-000593-FJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 03:23:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNcR0-0001Xc-9g for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 03:23:41 -0500 Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:25413) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNcR0-0001XG-0a for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 03:23:38 -0500 In-reply-to: <56A552EA.2040703@uq.edu.au> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ben Woodcroft Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" Looks good to me. Thank you. (I also checked the license. The FreeBSD/BSD-2 license is explicitly mentioned in the man page, and the text of the license is part of the repository. This should be okay, even though the source files themselves do not have license headers.) ~~ Ricardo