From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roel Janssen Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Rename texlive to tex. Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 10:59:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87lh2zsufx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160524050755.GA14800@jocasta.intra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46710) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b58BP-0003WC-2c for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 04:59:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b58BK-0000LO-6W for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 04:59:23 -0400 In-reply-to: <20160524050755.GA14800@jocasta.intra> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: John Darrington Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org John Darrington writes: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:14:59AM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote: > * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Rename texlive.scm to tex.scm. > * gnu/packages/texlive.scm: Rename file to tex.scm. > * gnu/packages/tex.scm: Renamed from texlive.scm. > * gnu/packages/algebra.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/docbook.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/engineering.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/gettext.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/gnome.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/lisp.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/maths.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/music.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/plotutils.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/python.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > * gnu/packages/scheme.scm: Rename texlive to tex. > > What is the purpose of doing that? I thought that texlive was the chosen > name that the project had. > > I think there are a few other implementations of TeX in the wild (though > mostly unmaintained). Furthermore, I think Knuth has a trademark on the word "tex". > > J' See this thread: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-05/msg00702.html I want to add Texmaker (an editor for TeX). Putting it in texlive.scm wouldn't really fit because it's not part of Texlive. So, the idea is to put everything TeX-related into one file (tex.scm). Kind regards, Roel Janssen