unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
To: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs.
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 10:18:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lh019dl0.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> (raw)

At some point I wanted to reply to the "Subject: none" thread Pjotr
opened. It kept growing and growing, and hit the length where I don't
feel like I want to add to it.
After many years I switched to notmuch for emails, because it all just
sucks. And even with notmuch, it just sucks: I apply tags to emails,
sort emails with tags which are relevant, but it doesn't fix email
itself. And that's the biggest problem I see here. Our communication is
based on a patchset of ancient technologies which require figuring out
how to fix their flaws by choosing the best user agent which does more
than just reading and sending email.
In my opinion we need something which provides *optional* email access
or emacs interface if you want that, but in general uses a framework
with sorting and management built in.
Email does the worst job. Email makes me personally angry. If I have to
tell someone to use a different mail user agent because theirs is
"obviously broken", the problem is not with the application. It's with
Email itself. I could go on about email and corporate networks with
statistics, but this is not my intention here.

On QA, this is okay. We need that like every operating system. As long
as we keep a culture of discussion alive and can talk about problems and
manage to respect our own code of conduct and solve problems, we are
doing a good job.

These are my comments on the part of the thread I've read.
But I want this to be an inspiration for some questions and looking for
a solution to them.


Ludovic: You said you tried various alternatives for patches/bugs etc
tracking in the past 3(?) years of Guix. Can you please summarize what
you remember about the applications you tested, positive and negative
results?

All: Please share your experiences, positive and negative, with project
management frameworks. Ideally it covers patches, discussions,
bugtracking and is accessible and usable at least via web browser.

I want us all to gather experiences, feedback, and ideas and see which
compromises we have to make to get to the point where we solved this big
problem. We'll definitely have to make compromises.
-- 
♥Ⓐ  ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org

             reply	other threads:[~2016-08-13 10:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-13 10:18 ng0 [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-08-13 10:46 Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs David Craven
2016-08-13 11:11 ` David Craven
2016-08-13 11:23 ` ng0
2016-08-14  5:41 ` Pjotr Prins
2016-08-14  9:14   ` ng0
2016-08-15  1:39     ` David Craven
2016-08-15  4:55       ` Pjotr Prins
2016-08-15  9:11         ` David Craven
2016-08-16 13:17           ` Ricardo Wurmus
2016-08-16 13:29             ` Pjotr Prins
2016-08-15 11:53 ` Hartmut Goebel
2016-08-15 13:30   ` Danny Milosavljevic
2016-08-15 15:18     ` Alex Vong
2016-08-16  7:20       ` Hartmut Goebel
2016-08-16 14:06         ` Alex Vong
2016-08-18 11:47           ` Hartmut Goebel
2016-09-01  6:32             ` ng0
2016-09-01 11:19               ` ng0
2016-09-02  0:27                 ` John Darrington
2016-09-02  0:58                   ` ng0
2016-09-02  5:50                     ` Alex Vong
2016-09-02  8:21                       ` ng0
2016-09-02 10:54                         ` Alex Vong
2016-09-03 16:44                           ` Pjotr Prins
2016-09-03 16:55                             ` David Craven
2016-09-03 19:19                               ` Brendan Tildesley
2016-09-03 19:53                                 ` David Craven
2016-09-03 20:42                                 ` Efraim Flashner
2016-08-16  8:37 David Craven
2016-08-16  9:01 ` David Craven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lh019dl0.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is \
    --to=ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).