From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Allan Webber Subject: Re: stumpwm and common lisp modules Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 03:35:48 -0500 Message-ID: <87lgyf12jf.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <87mviz7075.fsf@thor.jamestechnotes.com> <20160923003954.3b414e5e@uwaterloo.ca> <87fuopmdak.fsf@thor.jamestechnotes.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boROe-0003Hw-Ie for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 04:36:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boROZ-0006tD-JI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 04:36:19 -0400 Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:42724) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boROZ-0006rp-FQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 04:36:15 -0400 In-reply-to: <87fuopmdak.fsf@thor.jamestechnotes.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: James Richardson Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" James Richardson writes: > Andy Patterson writes: > >> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 23:40:46 -0400 >> James Richardson wrote: >> >>> Hello list, >>> >>> I was attempting to make a package for stumpwm. I got as far as, oh it >>> has a dependency on cl-ppcre (and a few other cl packages). Well it >>> turns out that actually putting a lisp module in a guix package seems, >>> well, non trivial. Does anyone else have an interest getting lisp >>> packages into Guix? >>> >>> >> >> Hi James, >> >> I've been working on a build system for CL packages for some time now, >> which works well enough to produce a working stumpwm package. It still >> has some missing parts and design issues which I've been mulling over, >> but if you're interested I could try to clean things up and post my >> progress soon. >> >> What do you think? > > I would be very interested! I'm not really a lisp expert (yet), but I > will help where I can. I'm very much so interested in running stumpwm again... please do continue! :)