Re: [PATCH] gnu: vim: Update to 8.0.0047.

[Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1651 bytes --]

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

> Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> writes:
>
>> The official vim mirrors only carries major versions and individual
>> patches, no up-to-date releases. This patch changes the source uri to
>> the tagged github releases instead of downloading all 40+ (so far)
>> patches individually.
>>
>> I'm not very happy about changing to a third-party source, but IMO it
>> beats keeping track of the frequent patches. WDYT?
>
> I’m also not happy about using a third-party mirror for vim.  Can we be
> sure that this is updated consistently and in time?  (Is this done
> automatically?)

When I sent this, the 0047 release was about an hour old and the
corresponding patch was not yet available on ftp.vim.org. So it seems
to be the other way around. The "vim" organization on Github is endorsed
on vim.org and maintained by Bram Molenaar himself.

> Guix can handle downloading patches, so there’s really no need for
> switching in my opinion.  “gnu/packages/bash.scm” could be used as a
> reference for how to deal with a large number of patches.

vim-7.4 ended at 2367 patches[0]. 8.0 is currently at 51 (four since
yesterday!), whereas bash has 42, so they are not really comparable. I
think vim would rarely be updated, if it required downloading and
creating potentially hundreds of patch references at once.

They are also not signed, though we could rely on the MD5SUMS file.

With this information, do you still think a custom patch importer is
better? I don't really mind either way, but someone needs to make it :)

0: http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.4/

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 454 bytes --]