From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Sassmannshausen <alex@pompo.co>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generate multiple paginated packages pages.
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 13:02:28 +0100
Message-ID: <87lgvq1ve3.fsf@pompo.co>
References: <20161129232224.28525-1-alex@pompo.co>
	<20161129232224.28525-2-alex@pompo.co> <874m2j76za.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87y3zuvfy8.fsf@pompo.co> <87eg1in3k9.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87oa0m1wx9.fsf@pompo.co> <20161208113648.GA21333@jocasta.intra>
Reply-To: alex@pompo.co
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33505)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alex@pompo.co>) id 1cExPM-0006Me-If
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 07:02:41 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alex@pompo.co>) id 1cExPE-0007kq-VH
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 07:02:40 -0500
In-reply-to: <20161208113648.GA21333@jocasta.intra>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Heya

John Darrington writes:

> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 12:29:22PM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
>     =20
>      > Note that I removed the all-in-one package page because the poor=
 CVS
>      > server at gnu.org simply can???t handle it.
>     =20
>      Sure ??? I figure this way of browsing is more user friendly anywa=
y???
>     =20
> Well yes and no.
>
> It's more friendly in the respect that it no longer takes 2 minutes to =
load.
>
> But the down side is that I can no longer load the page and then use my=
=20
> browser's "Find in Page" button to search for a package---Now I have to
> know what the package is called before I can search for it.

Fair point!  I think Luis Felipe is thinking of a more comprehensive
approach to the package pages =E2=80=94 mine was more of a quick fix to s=
olve an
urgent problem.

> Maybe sometime in the future a "browse by category" or "search for pack=
ages"
> feature will be available?
>
> J'