From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: updating gdk-pixbuf for epiphany Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 10:55:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87lgrj429s.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34556) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cuEpR-00011X-UX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 04:56:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cuEpO-0002Jk-35 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 04:56:14 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21005) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cuEpN-0002HA-S5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 04:56:10 -0400 List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel Hi, I’d like to update Epiphany to the latest release but noticed that it needs a slightly younger version of gdk-pixbuf. Updating gdk-pixbuf to 2.36.6 would result in *many* rebuilds. “guix refresh -l gdk-pixbuf” tells me this: Building the following 324 packages would ensure 630 dependent packages are rebuilt… So, should this be done in a separate branch along with other GNOME updates or can this go to staging after merging core-updates? -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net