Tonton <tonton@riseup.net> writes:

> Should we make the CoC more prominent or somehow inform about it
> better? For example by putting it or a link to it in the topic of the
> IRC channel, as it's own page on the website, if possible as part of
> the welcome message to the mailing lists, others?

I think those are good ideas.  I'd be curious to hear what Ludo and
Ricardo think.

We mention the Code of Conduct in the manual (see: "(guix)
Contributing").  However, you're right that it seems we don't
prominently mention it on the website.

I think the entire website is maintained in the "guix-artwork"
repository.  You can find its details here:

https://savannah.gnu.org/git/?group=guix

While we wait for Ludo and Ricardo to reply, perhaps you could submit a
patch that implements the changes you're suggesting?

> A second question is, the contributor covenant has evolved, should we upgrade
> ours from 1.3.0 to the current
> [1.4.0](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct)?

To help people understand what has changed going from 1.3.0 to 1.4, here
is a handy command you can use to get a visual diff of the versions:

  wdiff -n -w $'\033[30;41m' -x $'\033[0m' -y $'\033[30;42m' -z $'\033[0m' \
  <(curl https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/3/0/code-of-conduct.txt) \
  <(curl https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.txt) \
  | less -R

> The recurse center/hackerschool
>[manuals](https://www.recurse.com/manual)
> section on "social rules" is also much recommended, the whole document is
> quite good. For anyone interested in the topic.
>
> I'd be happy to provide more resources, seeing as I've spent the better part
> of a week researching this (I binge read when I find something interesting :).

Thank you for sharing it!

-- 
Chris