From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>
To: Brice Waegeneire <brice@waegenei.re>,
dannym@scratchpost.org, boskovits@gmail.com
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [GSOC 2020] network-boot-service
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 09:34:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lfk1anaw.fsf@ponder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a3468eee1187b5266a82456f80006035@waegenei.re>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2135 bytes --]
On 2020-07-02, Brice Waegeneire wrote:
> To support the widest hardware and boot options possible I went with
> iPXE
> as a chainloader. Meaning that any machine doing a PXE boot (or with
> builtin iPXE with restricted feature set) will load the iPXE bootloader
> first, which will then properly load the initrd.
iPXE is really cool! The main downside is I don't think the support for
non-x86 architectures is there, but would be happy to find out
otherwise.
> Currently I'm working on the initrd part to add NFS mounting capability
> to
> it. At this point I'm blocked by building a lightweight staticly built
> 'nfs-utils' package to be included in the initrd. It's current total
> size
> 219.2 MiB, I manage to reduced it to 162.2 MiB which is still one order
> of
> magnitude larger than my initrd at 19 MiB.
>
> My issue building a static 'nfs-utils' is that it can't find
> 'getrpcbynumber{,_r}' “configure: error: Neither getrpcbynumber_r nor
> getrpcbynumber are available”. This function should be provided by the
> libc
> or by libtirpc if it's not that first one. The problem is that
> 'libtirpc'
> don't build it's own 'getrpcbynumber' because it find one in libc but
> nfs-utils can't find it...
Have you looked into using klibc (or maybe busybox) instead? They might
be smaller and have enough capability to mount NFS.
> Some other distros are using the kernel parameter 'nfsroot'[2], but we
> probably don't want to use it since it can't be used together with an
> initrd and it also mean we need built-in modules for NFS and network
> card
> driver in the kernel.
Debian at least implements support for the nfsroot kernel parameter by
emulating the behavior in the initrd, using kernel modules instead of
built-ins. Seems like Guix could do the same?
If you're trying to use user-space NFS, I suspect you'll run into a lot
of issues... Debian at least dropped support for parts of the user-space
NFS stack years ago as it had huge numbers of bugs and little activity
upstream.
Great to hear about progress on this work!
live well,
vagrant
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-02 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-02 10:11 [GSOC 2020] network-boot-service Brice Waegeneire
2020-07-02 12:35 ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-07-02 16:34 ` Vagrant Cascadian [this message]
2020-07-02 18:59 ` Brice Waegeneire
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lfk1anaw.fsf@ponder \
--to=vagrant@debian.org \
--cc=boskovits@gmail.com \
--cc=brice@waegenei.re \
--cc=dannym@scratchpost.org \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).