From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 2EejDzS+RmI3dwEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 10:56:20 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id eKYQDTS+RmIvPgAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 10:56:20 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D37C7DFDF for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 10:56:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35088 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1naD4s-0001Ux-JJ for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 04:56:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51888) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1naCqI-0001NR-VT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 04:41:15 -0400 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=49582 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1naCqI-0001gl-G8; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 04:41:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=NmiREBMvFUiFFTtid5823CkU+SbAh4xTIg6SB4g/X5w=; b=o4rRRjmxBDkrs679Z75t wYNDYMFgRoaJqUTWlzZfjvfGEW9CdFXoKSCwAD4lfuYq6iFW3Fb0gdMXv2NX7UDQvuvMIaWjuXf2b 6XJC6WTipW1EfkHqIRiJ6LTGIwbk3N8wTip4P2AZLF1cGKy7gx7P9k6YrC08t/tmvyBEVy0ea+x4T KG14WFjfK56nAnd0xSQWtdbdkQU/5IJppEOTmHiKuZBbp7Gt+SYDKpsIucn421hcL8C2fNVHggbug Hk3mSNopjicHz3gZz1KFCGIjRJ2m0yqI9OWRWVSzX9Dp52dOh1xDFh6z/Xqoy9OiJ+qsdwcHQj7rZ aHuV4GaV3UpGmQ==; Received: from [193.50.110.173] (port=38538 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1naCqH-0004lN-Qa; Fri, 01 Apr 2022 04:41:14 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: LibreSSL? References: X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 12 Germinal an 230 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 10:41:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 29 Mar 2022 12:39:01 -0400") Message-ID: <87lewpp55k.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1648803380; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=NmiREBMvFUiFFTtid5823CkU+SbAh4xTIg6SB4g/X5w=; b=G+rLZXzVDdOyrGw9VYV8wq9xfG0WRcqUILJTJX5hQu6fq59l6cMVUsTgSrUoS+U0J0Jf1U SaXPCMXDIfOkcaTrFyfvb5pUeBqXenpKIRTmPG1LFmcgVzW6XlAz8gCqo5M9yNs7+x8VO2 1WeRcYALB7mCWm1vkwrkhhE4rRxgwFIMzOZv6gIOvO1S4WsVN0lAx/tVtBQ61v4RffJPR2 HoLCkx3+E4pLJtNm3BwNU/wpX6HlvALiW8omQw5lEP57+FlBREyZuUbu7PoIUTZZTtwvzv 8IqhUXJOgAdHHFKetxe9sQd61s6UdDDvIP+GBasUwcHpbKxxxCtLn+ZHnKhxXQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1648803380; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=aerwDgx/rBTjO6x7kmP9m6H2Jac7JJhGFeByRCec6X0J0e7URnxtkHcpC9/LMmy/KN1T5b DXYQrdiyp7rcsgvec3J/9bHvvDZxT7K+bWyXhm+/oaTCvDA87f3MMM6a8eVqLJQKUkls+z gCpvu/zgIpKBf0Nk8HSTmts9nCoebrC258KKnDzlc/0ZyxwFYVYEELAm7apRGzTpN8Kaea 3TjGZUaLi9iXior/YHw0NlhUDwHLKLiXaLh7jS7yN8RY3fMkC6A6MwgRfHzFCAZs3HNFma wqzbx31w+osEfq1nUbULcCm6w50VVYUAwp7LgRcsBhmE9apEDOf/BtgeG1zaWw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=o4rRRjmx; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.27 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=o4rRRjmx; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D37C7DFDF X-Spam-Score: -4.27 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: hro9LaGSs3Eq Hi, Leo Famulari skribis: > I noticed that some Guix packages depend on LibreSSL, but it seems that > we are not successfully keeping this package up to date with upstream > security releases: > > https://www.libressl.org/releases.html > > Will anyone step up to maintain this package? Or should we remove it > from Guix? At first sight, it looks like an easy-to-maintain package: no dependencies, few users, stable API. I tried to update it to 3.5.1 and was proved wrong though: there=E2=80=99s = one test failure in =E2=80=98tests/asn1object=E2=80=99 and the Internet doesn= =E2=80=99t seem to know how to address the problem. So it would need a bit more work. I=E2=80=99d lean towards keeping it and doing that extra work, collectively= , but I understand this very discussion shows that it=E2=80=99s debatable. Ludo=E2=80=99.