From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id CGTjLdEa72VFWwAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:53:05 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id CGTjLdEa72VFWwAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:53:05 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=dWEoZ58n; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1710168785; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=PbrPuZIPSf5ADVq6rXFJ1DMUlcXZPXgu8tLoArg35vmgiawYXZHZqvIC5nj84/5PYM+J0Z G3aNXResD2Pfl8j3RsIDULl+8Rgxh06fjZHg+9MgKmagi9vOZyhhsKZgogLAxFtkbj2Nu/ cF83zQywu0M2lbzncuQKNiEywldlGlM+w+nNnByPDOJj0222sCslwVHz02Ms/IfhjySAB1 8fhfx3ekgveRoAyi5GqhWK8R74tGFaM2SWa2/M2+PMwYLQVl5WmPxLFvOYcPeiQIrXSUo8 8G+hkYRbhUd9KNs7WFpwJon88ZJtd841jqzcN9aYwDCc88161ZVKQbd40FpJ1g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=dWEoZ58n; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1710168785; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=gX3oJY2REZ9h3qx039q/sUA1joVxzANTXDznedd/cIA=; b=ZPxbbugdxXmhDGvIJV9s+/EHmgVzVmI68gIiwodnOaMZDISDGl+upFMggo8y8JZRQYb+xU etnn0fUQ72c7sGdm1dfeyQiIOoaeCTYfBqm5RXiq3OdS+JZcA1CnkQEo8yctIB6K7i0caO S+hDtbIdtz030vEjD6z0dKMyu96g2e3w4qtK0VRYVptwKpZsdmyBA47osLLXDi9SjFmngU uKtNpQxTGHZCJQ3uNCI2m8LgiYB/gWrEmBIe8ILuRPu68T5sLXc8U2/4farY/w+qbUOJbE 1HlwTy3I67WLB0f37v+CJFlkdB64+Hzn08S1VM+mu2OZbyBPP5MAtEAOlIre+w== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 824B468C79 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:53:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rjh16-0005TE-Ap; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:52:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rjh12-0005Re-6U for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:52:36 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rjh0n-0005JW-E6; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:52:30 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-33e9115d501so458800f8f.0; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:52:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710168733; x=1710773533; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=gX3oJY2REZ9h3qx039q/sUA1joVxzANTXDznedd/cIA=; b=dWEoZ58nYapPqt5VQPviRNa4M4nRT5gKLxGuoFyFLfdo3dm48psd8gFPTmJGVTeZfp gX/VhAGsPxDzFsEZK5bUFgy1xhnq0JY+tXARPd69pkmSGzWrZoXrOy+R2uakSgc98DVj aO0/UGBQjRRk6Suh0qB9utvn5i1UJmVEr05u0Gzr8/AfbUSfeIAlHO3QYk6gE8qq1a0P ziegTDoRSb7xNIADjiPyKyONJ+72nPBkRSAm+mhJVny5H0cqoPDdU1Ey59FKF1v+64Ma 4cXt21RMXHmoPzqur+D72d9sOnjoSCIrwgPAzJ2/i8YNu9bytl/D60EbVLF1mZF4npUg Fdzg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710168733; x=1710773533; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gX3oJY2REZ9h3qx039q/sUA1joVxzANTXDznedd/cIA=; b=FbNyMEYPW5rqcAXEL1ibiX429AL8lD/kYxRYg8gj79QrLM2v3mbZsTZHBla3nUEQZm WFJ5hwqnFb1W0+fjxX5nB4I6y8KKG4SraBfR6q1uGFh8iTrWVI7WnYBBv5WiIjRgJ+lv i3xeVxsQphpy2tp5vpg0bDsB8nw+vHC7MWM+j/MpGaG0WEXl5MQGSx9oZrC70D+ad14O LX/Xtp7m2Tv63bUw1hT3l1d1eOZzucHa4DDL1RtHmTS7Y+PXUHM2bNIk943lBV2NhC4C +tVf2OG3/vdqMhxZE/22RhYZlfPRLviQtvb+oKtaRb25uHEfwXo0rcxNFg3xj2TPOXd9 Df+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzM6korSvqtzN00tIYXoZrbCge5/UoGGhSm6pQQdDM6SCuwgG48 mC1RUzWCwflMzui4xP/2iO7QtXrQFnDToF2Of2XTUVLsupAQMJAvwwOWVV5Q X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEDEYT6nI/XMr5BjDOyZMUBoHnjT3MeSxoB8kI3hc8rEoaXFz/gfh4XsPDbchUmOlOpnYikuQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f649:0:b0:33d:32f7:c85 with SMTP id x9-20020adff649000000b0033d32f70c85mr4202024wrp.0.1710168733268; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:52:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili (roam-nat-fw-prg-194-254-61-43.net.univ-paris-diderot.fr. [194.254.61.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w3-20020a5d6083000000b0033e75e5f280sm6614836wrt.113.2024.03.11.07.52.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:52:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Simon Tournier To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Christian Miller , Pierre Neidhardt Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Check for ANSI compliance In-Reply-To: <87a5oom6n3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87cytz7qzh.fsf@dadoes.de> <87a5oom6n3.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 19:07:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87le6s7g2x.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42c; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42c.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -8.56 X-Spam-Score: -8.56 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 824B468C79 X-TUID: yoXeR1rkL4Ga Hi, On lun., 29 janv. 2024 at 17:44, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > That used to be the case until commit > 672d3d4a87839b0692c307df0edb66cd16bcbf1a, which enabled colors even when > =E2=80=98INSIDE_EMACS=E2=80=99 is set. > > Pierre, do you remember what the rationale was? I am not Pierre. :-) The context seems: Guix search, colors and INSIDE_EMACS Pierre Neidhardt Tue, 04 Feb 2020 16:23:43 +0100 id:87blqeml4w.fsf@ambrevar.xyz https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2020-02 https://yhetil.org/guix/87blqeml4w.fsf@ambrevar.xyz Quoting [1]: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > new d7545a6 ui: Only display link in capable terminals. > new 672d3d4 ui: Don't disable colors when INSIDE_EMACS is set. Forgive me if I missed the discussion, but I thought we had reached rough consensus in favor of the status quo. What happened? --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Then quoting [2]: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- I=E2=80=99ve reverted it in c2f9ea2b502a617bb69227d5f858eee9d4288a6a, also because if was causing a test failure. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- where c2f9ea2b502a617bb69227d5f858eee9d4288a6a reads, --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Revert "ui: Only display link in capable terminals." This reverts commit d7545a6b538813e88195d084f75a3e87065c999e. The commit led to a test failure in 'tests/guix-package-net.sh'. It also led to disagreements discussed here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2020-02/msg00353.html Reverting until these are addressed. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- and thus 672d3d4 had not been reverted. Let revert it since it does not make sense without d7545a6, IMHO. Cheers, simon 1: Re: branch master updated (0aa0e1f -> 9b7f9e6) Ludovic Court=C3=A8s Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:31:06 +0100 id:87blpom285.fsf@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2020-02 https://yhetil.org/guix/87blpom285.fsf@gnu.org 2: Re: 01/03: ui: Only display link in capable terminals. Ludovic Court=C3=A8s Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:16:25 +0100 id:87wo87aaeu.fsf@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2020-02 https://yhetil.org/guix/87wo87aaeu.fsf@gnu.org