From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [ART] Logo proposal Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 23:35:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87k2zqaf2g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1423405549.2120.7.camel@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36357) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKwvk-0006tp-99 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:35:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKwvh-0003hq-2n for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:35:48 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36637) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKwvg-0003hm-Uv for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:35:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1423405549.2120.7.camel@openmailbox.org> ("Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo"'s message of "Sun, 08 Feb 2015 09:25:49 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo skribis: > I made some logos for Guix and GuixSD: > > * http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/static/temp/img/guix/Guix.png > * http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/static/temp/img/guix/GuixSD.png > > I understand if you prefer using the current Guix logo and no logo for > GuixSD, though. I just wanted to share anyways. I=E2=80=99m very impressed by both, I like them! It raises the two questions you mention. I sympathize both with what you wrote before and your current hesitation wrt. branding. I need to think more (and read more what others think) but yeah, why not a GuixSD logo. Thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99.