From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Lirzin Subject: Re: Review process Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 11:51:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87k2gc3cn8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <579027b7.VHXjhpPxQC3AAmeY%pjotr.public12@email> <8760rznoh1.fsf@gnu.org> <20160722004130.GA10340@thebird.nl> <874m7hk6dz.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <20160723022421.GA15436@thebird.nl> <878twsg1xb.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60677) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQtbJ-000397-Ec for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2016 05:52:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQtbD-0002ZV-DX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2016 05:52:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <878twsg1xb.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Sat, 23 Jul 2016 12:05:04 +0300") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Kost writes: > Pjotr Prins (2016-07-23 05:24 +0300) wrote: > >> Thanks Ludo. As it stands I am no longer submitting packages to ML. I >> did my utmost to make the package lean and clean. This package is not >> going in. >> >> But, I suggest you listen. I know at least 4 people here who say they >> have trouble submitting to Guix. Good people. > > 5 including me :-) I always feel big inconveniences sending patches, and > I don't like that the development happens on mailing list. However > unlike Pjotr and Jookia I think it's my problem, not the one of the Guix > community. > > I just wrote this because I'm almost sure that some day I will maintain > emacs interface separately from Guix again. I've been regretting all > the time that it became a part of Guix. I am interested to know what do you miss from that the period you were maintaining it separately? -- Mathieu Lirzin