From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] gnu: Add openocd.
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 06:34:19 +0100
Message-ID: <87k2cq9z8k.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <87h97xf19n.fsf@elephly.net>
	<20161028173606.31099-1-theodoros.for@openmailbox.org>
	<20161028173606.31099-4-theodoros.for@openmailbox.org>
	<CAL1_imm=SvHDcte-Y8cn3ggjYKhr1G1T0wbP+B_Y66JiZOz_fw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60960)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1c0ilO-0001Pc-H7
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 01:34:35 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1c0ilL-0004ds-Dp
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 01:34:34 -0400
Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:21363)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1c0ilL-0004b6-4r
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 01:34:31 -0400
In-reply-to: <CAL1_imm=SvHDcte-Y8cn3ggjYKhr1G1T0wbP+B_Y66JiZOz_fw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: David Craven <david@craven.ch>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>


David Craven <david@craven.ch> writes:

> Hi Theodor,
>
> I made libjaylink and jimtcl two separate packages and a couple of
> style changes.

In that case we can use the tarball release of openocd, no?

This would simplify the package as we would no longer need to
bootstrap.  Could you please take care of this?

~~ Ricardo