From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Subject: Re: pre-push signature hook error reporting
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 17:37:13 +0100
Message-ID: <87k293i8cm.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
References: <20170105161431.9803-1-dannym@scratchpost.org>
	<878tqpjw93.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<8760lj5eb6.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<20170113152400.GA24322@jasmine>
	<20170117031414.GB23513@jasmine> <87o9z1aksp.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20170121013910.GC26714@jasmine> <20170206153922.GA10240@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59608)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1camI9-000578-NS
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 11:37:26 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1camI5-0006yv-SE
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 11:37:25 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20170206153922.GA10240@jasmine>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>, Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:05:42PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> For the pre-push hook, the overhead seems reasonable (perhaps we could
>> limit the range to commits after the first signed commit to avoid
>> looping for no reason?) and an improvement.
>
> Here is a patch for the hook that I've been using for the past couple wee=
ks.
>
> For the common use case of pushing new commits to an existing branch, I
> don't notice the hook at all, except when it catches my mistakes.

Thanks a lot for this! I haven't tested it, but the code LGTM.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAliYpjkACgkQoqBt8qM6
VPog9QgAshxVY2aNJXLVsl897P5t419NdSOUbA1OXkTNRfkDH3NDhax3+CzNiTZe
NYqKz0cjPl8zVvjiZWoE10NxLyHa4D3LQ2PQHKBSa41vprVtUCH659lEjxqPImiy
kreSR2C/fk0hmD44zy+5xwt7Xf1HiRs7dT4W1SZUmvFZW9IdD0mn5gSunws4dXqz
qsmCZvSzIQxq8o50sIRlMAf7YT7vGTIR0Ha6GKceHrDCOr6GGU7StRr5dCDwPVl3
wqMzs4esv0LRe3v4A1azKk4SVmm69+CSL8+Gyds81kaQ0HMwwmx//VPRUSjg0Nnh
WaOUSE5rDiewPCN1vvz52XrPRLER1g==
=jiHJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--