From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: 02/02: gnu: python-pillow: Update to 4.3.0. Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 11:44:14 -0500 Message-ID: <87k1xawye9.fsf@posteo.net> References: <20171222165126.23934.71746@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20171222165127.9F00B2044A@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87tvwgknwv.fsf@netris.org> <87tvwgvt8c.fsf@posteo.net> <87incvlrgi.fsf@netris.org> <87o9mnwwc2.fsf@posteo.net> <20171225000310.GA1014@jasmine.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52888) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eTVrk-0007CF-Pn for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Dec 2017 11:44:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eTVrg-0005gH-N2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Dec 2017 11:44:40 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:55114) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eTVrg-0005e3-D3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Dec 2017 11:44:36 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F9CC20DB3 for ; Mon, 25 Dec 2017 17:44:31 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20171225000310.GA1014@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sun, 24 Dec 2017 19:03:10 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Leo Famulari writes: > On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 06:16:29PM -0500, Kei Kebreau wrote: >> I've attempted to use the upstream patch, but it involves some GIT >> binaries which aren't supported by GNU patch. Among other hackish >> options, temporarily upgrading to the appropriate upstream commit may >> fix this for now. > > Does it work if you pass '--binary' to patch-flags? It does not. Maybe I could use 'diff --binary' to patch the files into existence? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAlpBKt4ACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg3FjQ//XtmwMT7H1cE4w5tHdB4tQkgv0ioJ8Oq4DqawzwzP07AM052otN+OyF0s Coxw3iCjhFqvqDEBDCE6Q4SS3Mptdu/PInuA1VTOpEEYEMJ+VZ7OQy9c+uvQKJz4 gYyuNNej9qDtvE9lU4lAelxQg//UIru3FrtkUmt6c82vSys8dGPNeHMHh1WE4wUp 3SbfyWNVxOMZo9U7wF7U4ueMzXEv/ge8k1dstbFsIzif8K3CppLxJ05363xC6cPq DDUiI7qN8N7nRRH6arHHrmXIiEqZ99S30zmJYS8IuYfIICPWYuqumMycWwdwfMhC rM3Y120PeEGZLXouxfwjvjJosREQtT0VlUegjofCxM8yZQh0U6R7h1DkdzgOBVKn zLFDIVGbLH+wBK76hManzFQynI54nB0geGuOWJxOt/o/zU7RVKny3MT8Jx+TdKo5 gFH2DEOSxHkG0RVebgPY1xywPofdt8JtHTBwltOjTMgKwJFJSldPPP/dirq9FHhr TAvlmuWSpSGXmzrIGAFzkY6XdJWkDyyw1q+lfg1tLWCVf5+tuabnq5whEuFCi7Z+ IYlQRkNicndfLW01vbxq8egPPXaOIIJE5FbMi8vw9oEoE/v48D9QIQK+1orfHVxD kqrcDv+cn8VlSCzCLIG1a4RE4eWFZJ0OxCGuKWhLnyMwdpXBjq0= =G+gV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--