From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Communication and Design at Guix Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 23:08:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87k1j5ing2.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87k1jfuk26.fsf@gnu.org> <705CB66B-E8D5-4119-9F70-D429E1B174B2@pretty.Easy.privacy> <877efd1p56.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2dk4m4g.fsf@elephly.net> <87k1j81bau.fsf@gnu.org> <32DFF401-F4E7-4B98-A8B2-DC9A321500D7@disroot.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39203) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjWu4-0002Jj-5c for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:09:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjWu3-0007G9-5D for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:09:48 -0500 Received: from sender-of-o53.zoho.com ([135.84.80.218]:21747) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjWu2-0007BV-EU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:09:47 -0500 In-reply-to: <32DFF401-F4E7-4B98-A8B2-DC9A321500D7@disroot.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: nly Cc: Guix Devel , L p R n d n nly writes: > continuing with the emacs example, a guixwiki.org would be awesome as > an analog for emacswiki.org. User maintained, quick and short examples > with lots of supporting links. Hmm, I have the opposite opinion. I find the emacswiki to be a great example for what=E2=80=99s wrong with wikis :) I=E2=80=99d prefer to add to the documentation that comes with Guix. It do= esn=E2=80=99t all have to fit into the manual; there can be a tutorial document, and/or a =E2=80=9Ccookbook=E2=80=9D document =E2=80=94 all collectively mai= ntained in the main repository and matching the very same version of Guix that the user installed. I would welcome patches that add a new cookbook document. -- Ricardo