* Please merge guix-patches bug: 36789-36800 @ 2019-07-24 18:29 zimoun 2019-07-24 18:47 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: zimoun @ 2019-07-24 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Guix Devel Dear, My apologies! I did a mistake with `git-send-email`. I have missed how it works. I simply did: git send-email -11 --cover-letter --annotate --to=guix-patches@gnu.org and it is incorrect. Oups! What is the correct command line to first obtain a debbug number and second to send the series to this number ? Thank you in advance. And sorry again for the mistake. All the best, simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Please merge guix-patches bug: 36789-36800 2019-07-24 18:29 Please merge guix-patches bug: 36789-36800 zimoun @ 2019-07-24 18:47 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice 2019-07-24 19:31 ` zimoun 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice @ 2019-07-24 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: guix-devel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1375 bytes --] Zimoun, zimoun 写道: > Please merge guix-patches bug: 36789-36800 You can perform actions like this yourself by sending mail to control@debbugs.gnu.org. Here's some documentation[0] and a caveat[1]. > I have missed how it works. I simply did: > > git send-email -11 --cover-letter --annotate > --to=guix-patches@gnu.org > > and it is incorrect. Oups! Indeed! > What is the correct command line to first obtain a debbug number > and > second to send the series to this number ? I was certain that this was in the manual, but I can't find it quickly. Hm. What I do is to just manually write a cover letter in my MUA, send it to guix-patches@, and wait for the response with the bug number. I have to keep an eye on my inbox anyway, so I don't see the point of doing that on the command line. Then I git send-email --to=nnnnn@debbugs.gnu.org. > Thank you in advance. And sorry again for the mistake. That's quite all right. Thank you for immediately addressing it! Kind regards, T G-R [0]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/server-control.html [1]: In practice, there are hard limits on the length of these commands (and possibly the number of commands in one mail). I once sent a (scripted) ‘merge a b c d … j k l’ request and debbugs (silently) merged only the first n items. I forget what n was. [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Please merge guix-patches bug: 36789-36800 2019-07-24 18:47 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice @ 2019-07-24 19:31 ` zimoun 2019-07-24 19:55 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: zimoun @ 2019-07-24 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice; +Cc: Guix Devel Hi Tobias, Thank you for your quick answer. On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 20:47, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> wrote: > You can perform actions like this yourself by sending mail to > control@debbugs.gnu.org. Here's some documentation[0] and a > caveat[1]. I did not know. I thought that only person with super power could do that. So I will do. However, I am not sure to understand how the merge needs to be ordered. I have tried with 36789 and 36790. > What I do is to just manually write a cover letter in my MUA, send > it to guix-patches@, and wait for the response with the bug > number. I have to keep an eye on my inbox anyway, so I don't see > the point of doing that on the command line. If I understand well, the basic workflow is: git format-patch -N --cover-letter -o patches edit patches/0000-cover-letter.patch # send as you want patches/0000-cover-letter.patch to guix-patches@ rm patches/0000-cover-letter.patch # wait the bug number git send-email --to=nnnnn@debbugs.gnu.org patches/*.patch Right? > [0]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/server-control.html > [1]: In practice, there are hard limits on the length of these > commands (and possibly the number of commands in one mail). I > once sent a (scripted) ‘merge a b c d … j k l’ request and > debbugs (silently) merged only the first n items. I forget what n > was. Thank you. All the best, simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Please merge guix-patches bug: 36789-36800 2019-07-24 19:31 ` zimoun @ 2019-07-24 19:55 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice @ 2019-07-24 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: zimoun; +Cc: Guix Devel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2543 bytes --] Zimoun, zimoun 写道: > Hi Tobias, > > Thank you for your quick answer. You're very welcome. > On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 20:47, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice > <me@tobias.gr> wrote: >> You can perform actions like this yourself by sending mail to >> control@debbugs.gnu.org. Here's some documentation[0] and a >> caveat[1]. > > I did not know. I thought that only person with super power > could do that. Your implication that this is a huge potential security hole is correct. And yet, strangely, it works in practice. > So I will do. > > However, I am not sure to understand how the merge needs to be > ordered. > I have tried with 36789 and 36790. Your attempt looks successful to me[0]: ”Merged [snipped]. Request was from zimoun <…> to control@…. (Wed, 24 Jul 2019 19:18:02 GMT)” You should have got a confirmation e-mail as well. However… Note[0] that you were attempting to merge two already-merged bugs. Merged bugs act as one flesh, so you got a confusing response with all previous 11 numbers and the net effect of your command was zero. >> What I do is to just manually write a cover letter in my MUA, >> send >> it to guix-patches@, and wait for the response with the bug >> number. I have to keep an eye on my inbox anyway, so I don't >> see >> the point of doing that on the command line. > > If I understand well, the basic workflow is: > > git format-patch -N --cover-letter -o patches Oh, I really meant ‘manually’ as in I fire up my MUA (emacs in this case), write a ‘sup geeks here's a patch series that frobs foo’, add ‘[PATCH 0/n]’ to the subject by hand like an animal, and send it to guix-patches@. Does your command above generate a pretty diffstat or something? It probably does. > edit patches/0000-cover-letter.patch > # send as you want patches/0000-cover-letter.patch to > guix-patches@ > rm patches/0000-cover-letter.patch If you do want to send a *file* like this then yes, it is indeed easier to use sendmail or a similar command-line tool. I don't know the syntax for it by heart, though. > # wait the bug number > git send-email --to=nnnnn@debbugs.gnu.org patches/*.patch Since I don't need to edit anything I don't write my patches to the file system first. I use ‘git send-email … -7’ and away they go. But this is getting into personal preference territory :-) Kind regards, T G-R [0]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=36789#30 [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-07-24 19:56 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-07-24 18:29 Please merge guix-patches bug: 36789-36800 zimoun 2019-07-24 18:47 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice 2019-07-24 19:31 ` zimoun 2019-07-24 19:55 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).