From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: Please merge wip-haskell-updates (Re: [bug#36807] remove obsolete broken haskell packages) Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 13:19:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87k1bp1aut.fsf@devup.no> References: <87muh2ckdn.fsf@ngyro.com> <21D6742C-75C4-47A0-9F1A-0C911C24E3DA@vllmrt.net> <87mugmq5ll.fsf@ngyro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53009) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hvJyo-00043O-34 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 07:19:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hvJyn-0001mI-6E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 07:19:42 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:45435) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hvJym-0001lw-VG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 07:19:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Robert Vollmert , Timothy Sample Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 36807@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Robert Vollmert writes: > Oh, I meant to ask: > > On 6. Aug 2019, at 06:29, Timothy Sample wrote: >> Robert Vollmert writes: >>=20 >>> Hi all, Timothy, >>=20 >> Cool! I=E2=80=99m in the process of looking everything over. In the me= antime, >> I have some early questions and comments. >>=20 >>> I=E2=80=99ve incorporated your comments, and removed >>> ghc-packedstring. In addition, the branch incorporates some other >>> patchsets: >>>=20 >>> #36493: updating GHC-included haskell dependencies (this one is already >>> in core-updates) >>=20 >> I think it makes sense to wait for the core-updates merge (which >> shouldn=E2=80=99t be too far out). > > Why? Shouldn=E2=80=99t substitutes be available since CI built the branch= successfully? core-updates is still waiting for a full-rebuild change, and the CI is currently unusable, so merging might take a month or more still. Getting this in 'master' meanwhile would be great, especially for i686 users :-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl1Ks8oACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPra/ggAwprCPpf3vGAg9SLmpSIo5oXDalZppRI5tR2mPx1RSLVhlUtJAI5RIqNi AsON1gOCRBnmWXn8m7LM9goLBTr/j/IQxok+y8JzhUsf2Es38bLdXKTR1yPw6sH6 DqN7+iUlEVXIqrFQqAia8HsSJNXp6dWGLRo+wZGJHMQMohrXMO8Ac4TNZAyrYTwr HwNBxjVrpev3YSJ6NpJW/PjkxfbU2e1PoDnGQzaIB8D/etymqrVoynk/bm/I8I/M ye4eb9/UlOa+VIv0yp492cEGXYWHL4vvJcP0shfTzk+cR8ISBbaYLfhKzml2k7XQ H5NaoIBSuWi1DBesYr+PtM4AVNaI+g== =HDIL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--