From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: 01/01: services: Add =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98=2Fusr=2Fbin=2Fenv?= =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=99?= special file. Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2019 10:54:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87k1akwkp7.fsf@nckx> References: <20190906102509.28951.2772@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20190906102510.002BE21324@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87d0gdbtji.fsf@cbaines.net> <87mufhwhc6.fsf@nckx> <87zhjh6l7e.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60454) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i6WUG-0005XL-0m for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 04:54:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i6WUE-0002gz-5E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 04:54:27 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2001:470:7405::1]:49246) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i6WUD-0002el-GO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 04:54:26 -0400 In-reply-to: <87zhjh6l7e.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark, I'm going to disregard the ad-hom; energy is indeed precious for=20 all of us. I am disappointed that you cho(o)se to respond in this=20 manner, and after the fact. Promptly reverting patches you=20 disagree with is a privilege that few can afford. An equally=20 forceful response in May would have been much more appreciated. Mark H Weaver =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > How did you come to that conclusion? Did you assume that there=20 > must not > be any good argument against it because you couldn't think of=20 > one? :-/ What do you think? > We discussed this long ago and decided against including=20 > /usr/bin/env. Could you link to this decision? My duckduckfoo is lacking, but=20 please remember that I read the mailing lists too. I am aware only of previous discussions[0][1] in which you didn't=20 participate (there is a reference to a 2015 IRC comment but that's=20 long since gc'd). Kind regards, T G-R [0]:=20 https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-11/msg00414.html [1]:=20 https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-02/msg00205.html --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCXXNwNAAKCRANsP+IT1Vt eQbOAQCDYoja/AwCcRAesKyzfrA4qsiRHmzjF0RUNLautlWN9gEAoCP4aIGimGOO 05mINqJJlnkYhsxWtGfl0uXmlBc/iws= =wbMn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--