From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 0BUaHiHyxF5ufwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 09:02:25 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id wCjVGSHyxF76UAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 09:02:25 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 236CD940308 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 09:02:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34404 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbKcJ-0004Jf-RN for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 05:02:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbKcB-0004JN-N3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 05:02:15 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:55277) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbKcA-0002N3-HS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 05:02:15 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 78.199.129.170 Received: from mimimi (moi44-1-78-199-129-170.fbx.proxad.net [78.199.129.170]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4777360012; Wed, 20 May 2020 09:02:09 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: Re: Can we increase the print width/column in daemon backtraces In-Reply-To: <87muf38yzh.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87tvbn7ff3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k1cjihvm.fsf@elephly.net> <87h87n78yf.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87muf38yzh.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 11:02:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87k117x9m7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.195; envelope-from=mail@ambrevar.xyz; helo=relay3-d.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/20 05:02:11 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.61 X-TUID: mp1vJCHPyt9+ --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This has stopped working for me a while ago. Could it be that Guile's behaviour changed here? =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl7E8hAACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH9vTAgAmza1aAq8sfgv2KAGQ/6aNjUmkzNTuBflt7BmudNjuuS6j/Nhn6/r29MW rqv+9jk0K2WatpYBMDYjPj0YGRdytSETlTdvsYnshvtFqehSGTJ5d5w7qMhaBqun MMPu1IY1ch3Vaf50inFxJ6Ua1TqQesynjH6qa7Xxkvlxt277rO27fr+KkKlIVKIM 6+T5mPwHhU8CIl1O+5t3bBcZiGIYCi+6kMQLpwvo1ieuJUmKvxeHlwXbb5jHTQVp M4L6Tql2O8h/P6TPfPrLFkJo7filb97B7jmqZECETefipicwZ3XVOBUtGXO3ZXRZ WB8UWzm96t+P5QfqTm4xTgO4AW3Frg== =ZiMz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--