From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 8MpGOhIDhl/yIwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:42:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id qOUdNhIDhl86QQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:42:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1BF694053C for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55552 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSQBV-0008EE-MS for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:42:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43678) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSQBN-0008Dp-P2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:42:01 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:37660) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSQBL-0002Yv-MI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:42:01 -0400 Received: from localhost (188.29.111.164.threembb.co.uk [188.29.111.164]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAFF727BBEB; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 20:41:55 +0100 (BST) Received: from capella (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c15e8952; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:41:53 +0000 (UTC) References: <86mu0rt95k.fsf@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Christopher Baines To: zimoun Subject: Re: Reproductibility, Data Services, guix weather In-reply-to: <86mu0rt95k.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 20:41:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87k0vtx69t.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.71.252.8; envelope-from=mail@cbaines.net; helo=mira.cbaines.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/13 15:41:56 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.11 X-TUID: uamUnGxIlCuH --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable zimoun writes: > The issue is to be able to find them. I proposed (below) to run cron > task doing =E2=80=99--check=E2=80=99 on the build farms and then report b= y email the > failure. Chris indicated me the work they is doing [3] and instead of a > cron task, they is proposing to parse the JSON. That=E2=80=99s what the = tiny > script attached is doing. > > guix repl -L . -- weather-repro.scm > > For example, I run: > > guix repl -L . -- weather-repro.scm | sort | grep ghc > > to list (almost) all the unreproducible Haskell packages. What I would > like is to be able to filter by build system for example. > > > First, Chris could you add the fields package name and version? Because > it is hard to automatically reconstruct them by parsing the output-path. Done in [1], and I've updated data.guix-patches.cbaines.net. 1: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/data-service.git/commit/?id=3Df15= dc5ab0b48f4228a3c545052a1e4daf3e80f15 > Second, the revision of > does not match the Guix commit. Is it possible to have a bridge? Other > said, how is computed this revision hash? > > (A working revision is 6cf35799dec60723f37d83a559429aa8b90482d5 which > does not seems founding in Guix repo.) So, that particular commit is just some revision of Guix with some patches applied. I picked it because it was the most recent data. There's now recent commits for the master branch itself [2] like [3]. 2: https://data.guix-patches.cbaines.net/repository/2/branch/master 3: https://data.guix-patches.cbaines.net/revision/ec82d58526c27a9ca26f6c5e3= 9cec90a48cbc1cc --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAl+GAv5fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9XdYyBAAhLR6cNhXCdObrcwZvvgpgJk5ISFokhLY jaIPkKfFsoWC7FHtc67ldnzyuCDstSU4dGC7DEQnXx+aV/ldvJ47Rez74N8T7lL3 VLWUlPSO4XHjAtLjLafqJ0yeWGW9ml/lct6yzNEHK/xBQCqx7gZ6bcTYW2XmzIog WIkXJVp7JgV79ToPKrbitrRS7cBnFVuS2NKE2YLITmPWQ8tsKmuAgN87J7oKurX7 /L0Dws9oy8lircln6ynK2C3ktJFuxCRdxJPUY/YKZbXOAmGr2cKgp+3ce0smzWi4 AISdjutFJjtdtOzQyKpD0naeEuYbKJ4IXyxh9ieM3GBzE9sTW9CLIcNC2VRNmI0I ja1sa5PA2rwixySU7cOh41KLVXl1zFPZop/3HFGgt79hugjM4x57FTlvrREsM13r etwUELgMPHMQfErezXtElBDAUR9mXnLzcF91b5pzCwdFy55JL/DvWWReltL6AYwO qp64o1fr7UQMIukblMNkGsNotZw7mIjdPmeDiJap5VhB3kwS3Fwah4oHuggtMUN9 bwk5Powg7S46GjzUTjpGvSQm5CgBslJKmwUk3e3zvX+WTnaNYxpD0OGzick8Bt+M Izu8rJJSSQosNtAQV0RQEpTFHwmnU0ouYQE13EtevpFxZ6M+q46HdqBTn2soekJX cIdEO9KLJB0= =x3nX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--