From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id kI60DmE3oV/gXgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 10:56:33 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id kHOSCmE3oV/BDAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 10:56:33 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00C8D9401CD for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 10:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43934 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZtzL-0004nX-Ps for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 05:56:31 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56658) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZtz9-0004n4-FL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 05:56:19 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:58768) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZtz7-0003oT-Cx for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 05:56:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018; bh=V020cP50JvsJ5O2mLdrHKPCJRJ1oSEG2mGivE9sr/PY=; h=date:in-reply-to: references:subject:cc:to:from; b=cgnviYFOvizb2Vo2TTiwTd/2COfE4xlLIbGXy DunlCwvUE7pa8k810mIJynCPhyGEuDA3/hb/F+xW62EKwbOr8DRQvcQ32zKjZIFqfHBgjb aqBAvi68XeWkeOy5jKY8+r44GPjgJpxDq5FGoXKaP+8cgtC/lXOswL9ES+lBaVEKcz4oy1 d0yXbcNTLD194PfcSQrvdIO4KFBZvoqaPjXibyBCBZ+f9pdIoCutWbR4EJ+5g9lJh9mjcP SpkbW94fTdKri9909VWuSTuy57osP0iz1ACn3BPLt1Q0VP3nqoyjeY7S/VPogX8ufCxcXd cKkjRHbGNSCjehRrvbnsnqebA== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 69379fd6 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 3 Nov 2020 10:56:15 +0000 (UTC) BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: Raghav Gururajan Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Linux-Libre-LTS References: <87ft5x1luf.fsf@nckx> <07ff0907-e048-7213-5ca9-72a9f6c47c25@raghavgururajan.name> In-reply-to: <07ff0907-e048-7213-5ca9-72a9f6c47c25@raghavgururajan.name> Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:56:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87k0v2hfon.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=cgnviYFO; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=tobias.gr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.31 X-TUID: Gxm1JrNjZwEe --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Raghav, Raghav Gururajan =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Sure! Yeah, making it default was the next thing in my mind. Honestly no idea where I stand on that but I can bring the=20 popcorn. >> We should use upstream[0] release names, though, not roll our=20 >> own >> (+less clear) ones. So =E2=80=98-longterm=E2=80=99 instead of =E2=80=98= -lts=E2=80=99. > > By upstream you mean linux-libre or linux? Linux. Linux-Libre don't develop a kernel nor backport/provide any of=20 said long-term =E2=80=98support=E2=80=99. They're =E2=80=98upstream=E2=80= =99 of us in a trivial=20 way: we gratefully re-use their work. > The linux-libre uses the name 'lts'. Where? It's neither here[0] nor there[1]. I found it on blogs. The name isn't that important; just don't change it for fun, and=20 =E2=80=98longterm=E2=80=99 is what I'm used to hearing upstream. Kind regards, T G-R [0]: https://www.fsfla.org/ikiwiki/selibre/linux-libre/ [1]:=20 http://linux-libre.fsfla.org/pub/linux-libre/releases/5.4.74-gnu/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX6E3WA0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15kMUBAMfysXXJC7QmXdAuSYIdWbaIVgzwVxjgb3JsR/pX WoOHAQCQPZ6/PEHVZRKO+m6DDhjPBR64bJbRQgjn5p10elytCw== =7zu8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--