From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id oHh/HFcab2H5ugAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 21:19:51 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 0NwIGFcab2FKUAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 19:19:51 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D165BB0C1 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 21:19:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51236 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcueL-0002X9-Sd for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 15:19:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53102) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcudt-0002W1-Ep for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 15:19:21 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21107) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcudq-0002zK-I5; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 15:19:21 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634671154; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=UwNqZyJrg9u+1r3NHzRntWysm8T+Sof+i5Rhrk31svdOpXVwImeNeCDnluEdg3FieBdKrX9dXvxMC1/4x8nfxMWKFadIV8EUs1lZfayulDChqnjXnBpr7BVlKKTEuuMLDmpsj65gGBBEkAYQbuV7qL2XF97dE0t1XA4tv0J3b0k= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1634671154; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=28yITRoUJo3RxMdsar1fMwOh+NvjJneq4qSawE15Rf8=; b=DEiW5a7kFaUuY/iDixmySlytG7031hZv8etEIzI1xw1bRBpxam4Qqu3JxqFtMSfOBSec/KWpWmFu2JKzvvZppBrko6fWmlE5qKM4G7FE4P4zEG7R+4vO8faTxkQO0UYo+hrO+tF14fhP8/PvQL8YigKbgJVFafqlkW9I9ROnDUU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1634671154; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=28yITRoUJo3RxMdsar1fMwOh+NvjJneq4qSawE15Rf8=; b=gVlp9+qYzlrFxnQtVbtLwHiS9s5EoM+L30I3gOonHCNBhEonCzoSNw8MIjSj5nza uONvAr/ww/r9uRRE7Lu67RX2y2lel+jix23ml29qlKHoFSxh/EnMFcxwqodbB6x+uOP u6ArTINfld0uztBs84cobf6YS96L247gmkWBCyX8= Received: from localhost (p54ad483c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.72.60]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1634671148825406.75983006881063; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 12:19:08 -0700 (PDT) References: <874k9if7am.fsf@inria.fr> <86ee8hfm1k.fsf@gmail.com> <87sfwx896z.fsf@inria.fr> <86k0i9drh5.fsf@gmail.com> <87mtn56mzg.fsf_-_@inria.fr> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.5; emacs 27.2 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: Incentives for review Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 21:14:01 +0200 In-reply-to: <87mtn56mzg.fsf_-_@inria.fr> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Message-ID: <87k0i8q0uv.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External Received-SPF: pass client-ip=136.143.188.51; envelope-from=rekado@elephly.net; helo=sender4-of-o51.zoho.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1634671191; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=28yITRoUJo3RxMdsar1fMwOh+NvjJneq4qSawE15Rf8=; b=E/Xyqz+s6gS/klmUi0wRvwbXjYmAC1WRcK4QxdT9Momp8sZn3lvjHr3vzrQz9iXR13DV0J JuCmXCdK3ZtoufIPTShEvQ2q7Vbf6zcx46gqpLfUaU425cbhkbwJPV5pPyuWdJt9Xa1jq4 gNXrB6EYD4Ffw1cRn3ANpdCbC/RYoLHinNPZ/+d3It4+fgz1ut+uuSdl1N2TsZqw7xxVZA T8W/vCETrRxA455N8FmS+rw6VloJwPnGeiYwDasMNeX73anjWG9LAOzJrIGGslzYy+jWlx bkBlgnlWDAQO78yNMKDw5Rg4OMC81Uz0tIxIVmgck47XK0fGYzKYrPZfuO0IXg== ARC-Seal: i=2; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1634671191; a=rsa-sha256; cv=fail; b=A5QLGmdsI6jUpFlGlITvwcqr4FoFmde/KAO8ep4FELn5KphuiFHqRxlPxiR9UDBMvo8clj 6PtiW7eKcrr8qwrOtm5U3Ug9VWiWjsfdUWg20Tw9feCUAgp6TW3PRZQlT6X/Z4YGEw0F6G SOPQLyR8LJBvg0xpR97ZvlOz6rK93371N92x8+6/Fe0DXjPDXkaTPjll7RCD4zV1bflDNJ +yxEobNpbsCD9NNYzqQ6aqzb0DyoS3UBRH3W1MfVdnw+8AzvPlNiOfEEsG+4d5wDhV3aoy xo1VsB5EBnBa39y1jUzocvfjtE6HqTxSB4nPa5KU1nzB0Qx7haoBTLeOsC1qeA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=elephly.net header.s=zoho header.b=gVlp9+qY; arc=reject ("signature check failed: fail, {[1] = sig:zohomail.com:reject}"); dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.57 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=elephly.net header.s=zoho header.b=gVlp9+qY; arc=reject ("signature check failed: fail, {[1] = sig:zohomail.com:reject}"); dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D165BB0C1 X-Spam-Score: 0.57 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: LtI9ex1D23SX Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > A good middle ground may be to provide incentives for review.=20 > How? I=E2=80=99m > not sure exactly, but first by making it clear that review is=20 > makes the > project move forward and is invaluable. You once proposed=20 > having > =E2=80=98Reviewed-By=E2=80=99 tags to acknowledge non-committer reviews, = and I=20 > think > that would be one step in that direction. Perhaps there are=20 > other > things we could do? I was thinking in the opposite direction: not incentives to=20 recognize reviewers but a closer relationship to the patch=20 submitters, i.e. =E2=80=9Cpatch buddies=E2=80=9D or mentorship. If I made = myself=20 officially responsible for reviewing commits by Simon and all=20 commits touching R then I=E2=80=99m more likely to actually do the review=20 for these patches. Reviews done by people who are not committers could also be=20 acknowledged, of course, but applying the patch (sometimes=20 manually because of conflicts) is still manual work that can feel=20 like a chore if the committer doesn=E2=80=99t feel a connection to the=20 patch or the person who submitted it. --=20 Ricardo