From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id iILqCg1IamJ7LwEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:53:49 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id uCO6Cg1IamKd+QAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:53:49 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93E3BBADC for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:53:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48798 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1njyy8-0000fP-Lf for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 03:53:44 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1njygW-0006HZ-3Z for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 03:35:37 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45392) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1njygV-0002in-B2; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 03:35:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=LavUhLNtKcSb/Z7T8gmLUud7WO1Gnd6rgcirRYgEW2s=; b=qD7ln5L9Lvnnl0iB+doE Tl+RZk52MpVXJ2wB5pqUdkyMKPp3Inek4DAfJcQfksI0ZEZJeLafsm2k0ssQEUJUB3NLzneo1H2Y7 xSJKwpb1X7l9GM9Uh0ojOz97ZoeCHfmzjFsQE8XrCwCHvHR8A7OV23sIW7UuNeX+IwrknevD1CKxW QjtlSX/DNRjDGJ5rzHkKZhFcI1HcnTHihPXNWu+bDUk23WRl9L8+nuvZ1HsqyzrGVpcZH24wubj2M V6udgX0LXdx1O1ZQU4VH/WSquudNUckqQ+hvgPvrqyTbmwwXOFknO+2XdT3swz2f+uOmVvd/NWXV/ V0fLkT1LAIAKuw==; Received: from [193.50.110.83] (port=54054 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1njygU-0007iP-U0; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 03:35:31 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Tanguy LE CARROUR Subject: Re: Finding a =?utf-8?B?4oCcZ29vZOKAnQ==?= OpenPGP key server References: <164966505518.14431.3309259068866383863@localhost> <87tuaqw36n.fsf@gnu.org> <165056133382.1357.5086217061038440864@localhost> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 9 =?utf-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 230 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:35:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <165056133382.1357.5086217061038440864@localhost> (Tanguy LE CARROUR's message of "Thu, 21 Apr 2022 19:15:33 +0200") Message-ID: <87k0b9fynz.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1651132425; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=LavUhLNtKcSb/Z7T8gmLUud7WO1Gnd6rgcirRYgEW2s=; b=Rh1OsVan+r+U7sgsEssLMDqDcbsLcPppEoemEgYK6z8b1aX0WobLICGB84294u/Bvv7O1C p1tz4/M7gGuhnaH44SmF73wIx/rl7RSp81aFP4f3VRfvvhY/H0bepRHcf/RInLtJZ0IQ0+ sJlaeZvAasvfFCIGHjOVYF2CR3kRGzYEHDibq3kFD+8ej+HR59ln2C7jGfOb0xVIB+BtI+ lXOXOQ4PSpO2H1ZThveU10x1JEe3SPWugP8BL6jAezxc1aQeIQADVf/m/prnsPqX0SVSWq Yq6R5wwT07lW8SELbHF672qqgCVB0rPfiyYd08A51uC2AZw0JMyTykymT5Amsg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1651132425; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=choOP9Str1+xUHSilqT26vs0UL8htshss4NeMvVuR9os3ykLzvyfqHU+cOO8Bp7hH1ceej EA1XYSSkz8KY6jltvvYI52UrjH9cC5ZQ8ZsFLSqGN8NofmAbedvUiWJC4mONAIz5Vqph0t 9jbWAg+WSkVJg90agiZL4a0ppcBVeeGPqhUizy4aH4ENmDi1P/i1R4dUB98Yhy9M36C1pC 0NsZYEnOVcjMp8gGzKBXytvq3wJ/oZyz83nXwsw3Ff1l4G+nnAnt+sLffI/a/GhQJXSmz6 0zoY12NJgoJOSBXV+s0WNIZjt+U93m7e+14kGNhtteW1VKnu7X7fCyI8T+AZnQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=qD7ln5L9; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -9.50 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=qD7ln5L9; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 93E3BBADC X-Spam-Score: -9.50 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: /V8thp/78Cmp Hi, Tanguy LE CARROUR skribis: > Actually, Nikita answered this question on a thread on GNUnet's mailing l= ist: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnunet-developers/2022-04/msg00030.html > > The end of the discussion is off list. The key used to > sign the package is deprecated and not to be used any more/any where. Hmm, so how=E2=80=99s one supposed to authenticate it? > The proper solution should come from GNUnet, but maybe, we could bypass > the key verification in Guix. Or, I could clone the repo, claim > ownership and sign a new package myself. But that doesn't look like a > good/fair solution to me! Thoughts?! Sure, if you can update to what you think is genuinely the latest version, please go ahead. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.