* Remove lash
@ 2022-11-22 15:04 Ricardo Wurmus
2022-11-23 22:18 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Wurmus @ 2022-11-22 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guix Devel
Hi Guix,
on a modern Guix System with Gnome we’re pulling in Python 2. That’s
because gtk uses lash, and lash (last commit was 14 years ago) comes
with Python bindings — for Python 2.
I’d like to propose one of the following steps:
- remove lash completely
- build lash without Python bindings, removing python2
- remove lash from fluidsynth, thereby removing it from the gtk closure
What do you think?
--
Ricardo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Remove lash
2022-11-22 15:04 Remove lash Ricardo Wurmus
@ 2022-11-23 22:18 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-11-29 4:17 ` Maxim Cournoyer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2022-11-23 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ricardo Wurmus; +Cc: Guix Devel
Hi,
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:
> on a modern Guix System with Gnome we’re pulling in Python 2. That’s
> because gtk uses lash, and lash (last commit was 14 years ago) comes
> with Python bindings — for Python 2.
>
> I’d like to propose one of the following steps:
s/steps/options/ ?
> - remove lash completely
> - build lash without Python bindings, removing python2
> - remove lash from fluidsynth, thereby removing it from the gtk closure
>
> What do you think?
I’m not familiar with Lash, but based on your description, I’d be in
favor of removing it entirely, and definitely for removing it from GTK.
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Remove lash
2022-11-23 22:18 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2022-11-29 4:17 ` Maxim Cournoyer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2022-11-29 4:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Ricardo Wurmus, Guix Devel
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:
>
>> on a modern Guix System with Gnome we’re pulling in Python 2. That’s
>> because gtk uses lash, and lash (last commit was 14 years ago) comes
>> with Python bindings — for Python 2.
>>
>> I’d like to propose one of the following steps:
>
> s/steps/options/ ?
>
>> - remove lash completely
>> - build lash without Python bindings, removing python2
>> - remove lash from fluidsynth, thereby removing it from the gtk closure
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> I’m not familiar with Lash, but based on your description, I’d be in
> favor of removing it entirely, and definitely for removing it from GTK.
+1. Thanks for taking care of that, it had bothered me as well.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-29 4:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-11-22 15:04 Remove lash Ricardo Wurmus
2022-11-23 22:18 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-11-29 4:17 ` Maxim Cournoyer
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).