From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id BfwgH+k5+WR3YgAAG6o9tA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 Sep 2023 04:48:09 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id BfwgH+k5+WR3YgAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 Sep 2023 04:48:09 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 590983833D for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2023 04:48:09 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=NbmElRPO; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1694054889; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=JDAkO/fWYfYNXyThU34L8OO6c2lhEv2gMCTspZm0MRM=; b=p5/WZ+wJUdQLvSqG8bInSq8X96WY4G9VdKwF2a7oeKkX9gE8sHCSzYCXkuU8MJb+1AZ2cG gph8h/swmCXFIj0NiIwpnf7TQopJaj88U/5/84iEv8KEgd7L2qSzWr4NtFjkO7QaUz8L8F kKrEFcHmqnEB1mu+ObBaYTENrIprlj/xgFGtBnCPh4ijK/udEUNRKYzTSxMv7iSx8O1EsW yG1uNrwONRbHjNGQJNQfE9qpDuCxI/hBgZyBDO06brg2s/M1lb7nG81JMacvG9aiwYzj4U Ba13osbcSHJrZqaA1k4F624dqtePP46fwruN8a8VD9G1kfjOTniOg4OP+KdNpA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=NbmElRPO; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1694054889; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=nNWE4IyZJBngRitYrmz8GMLiw3uVNA8JnwWBO2rnOM0mQkBUA7M+sbfejYMrkSVko96iQq xxthGQm9CTN602ZKrurukVyBqIXvx12NWPGFqCuJ2zzY7eu6Agiz5P+z5ATfPIN/FAbLYE qpLmkhCG2DRDW+pI/7KgEGGvfJR9Hv7P19RaQ4T8nJmHVsdglTr4Zgx0ZtxePBYYMinFcg ZcstEPkQKZkfeTRu3LWuXtUT80V6aa4+OOnLmG1AWUlnT17/+45rJpYNbYAP0XwWgP5497 rPmwQVJ5bCyve0iY8bvsh8ykdA9lP0jP6CR9o1ubAuonk+pAMm73VItOACuUhQ== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qe53K-0007gZ-Lh; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 22:47:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qe53F-0007gG-Gr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 22:47:25 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-xf33.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f33]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qe53D-0001W1-AO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 22:47:25 -0400 Received: by mail-qv1-xf33.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-64b98479a66so2920646d6.0 for ; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 19:47:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694054842; x=1694659642; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JDAkO/fWYfYNXyThU34L8OO6c2lhEv2gMCTspZm0MRM=; b=NbmElRPOTeYoA5zlj2nXph2wEjexp8RuGNle2hIJ52R6tdEaclt88/BXryREO0HT46 7m2L8+NlzNiipD74taCChd2EPMjNjejM7Xb0kh7toHVH2XpDBH+ynYX4nwUAYFeicGE9 0KuPGDSTJOmqaNAezy16SIUy/FWldEzd45bOGRcOKotn+bZuHcylZMZsfDwracxwzSnM Ey0u1+MvBGSP2P4SJae8FEYBwKQs+KZVuz6H73Ua6fS8iTvF2o7eATDsCWRKCvPVKGq2 aE1l2IOj3oBw9ASVGeN5HariblBXKYukH1UbWhZyd89SdVRJE9wWHl7p3v9IOCLggMdq 10ZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1694054842; x=1694659642; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JDAkO/fWYfYNXyThU34L8OO6c2lhEv2gMCTspZm0MRM=; b=kWoao0oxfksFDRGJnmRleqOi/ftcjL0ZrtikupAm01/E1HPIyS4FmIaJkmml1jw6a6 Vo2n4CBiU8/WPLv/WW8vF//GVfbbd8/AY++IODDsrRF3Dh4Cpsarp9st5qwTgnWQUy7m LqyzeOuzDed7q/efxGsocFgkXzWHOuSyn+xZjxFCnkYgESrAKIiBfmRnzDTQdjW8jxYM 5gSdimG/cLAAHBjo2ZyAlkP//3CNyDg+DuKcuaAJeNZPanONHCdlusNWtSCTXdVJquom bU3NPQQhQJ5iJ2M8oqIrKnONx2mMpLHyAIBh6Er7uF/jlNdYmXirgPDfcoKkxrSsUErp OQ/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzA2otCT19ks1DVS5Oan5FPV92cjm5mXA0bFHVD9lrM4qUCw9/B NcxMYU26UBTcfGj254CuCwOHJOMksGsYMA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE4gP7GpErKk/hBxhUZiN5EQd6x3PWeUWFFcmNWoM+dxcrwqGERXhek4j4C1zx9FO2x5hi6lA== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e04c:0:b0:64f:a6f2:c6f9 with SMTP id y12-20020a0ce04c000000b0064fa6f2c6f9mr13997546qvk.12.1694054841816; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 19:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-153-125.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.153.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s18-20020a0cdc12000000b0064f46422ddasm5907060qvk.145.2023.09.06.19.47.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Sep 2023 19:47:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Simon Tournier Cc: Christopher Baines , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Process for reviewing patches as someone without commit access References: <87o7ifb66o.fsf@cbaines.net> <86sf7qn996.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2023 22:47:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <86sf7qn996.fsf@gmail.com> (Simon Tournier's message of "Thu, 07 Sep 2023 01:59:33 +0200") Message-ID: <87jzt2og1z.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::f33; envelope-from=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com; helo=mail-qv1-xf33.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 590983833D X-Migadu-Scanner: mx1.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -8.09 X-Spam-Score: -8.09 X-TUID: PwLjGVG9w+ej Hi Simon, Chris, Simon Tournier writes: > Hi Chris, all, > > On Wed, 06 Sep 2023 at 16:55, Christopher Baines wrote: > >> Once we know what tags to use, I can have the QA frontpage do something >> similar to the "Mark as moreinfo" links, so it's easy to just click a >> button then send the email to change the state of a issue. > > That=E2=80=99s cool! > > Well, using emacs-debbugs and then > > C-u M-x debbugs-gnu-usertags guix-patches RET > > the list of usertags is: > > guix-patches for-core-updates > guix-patches reviewed-looks-good > > And if instead of guix-patches we consider guix then it reads, > > guix build-system > guix cross-compilation > guix for-core-updates > guix looks-good > guix patch > guix plz-work > guix powerpc64le-linux > guix ready-to-review > guix reproducibility > guix reviewed > guix reviewed-looks-good > guix test-tag > guix v1.3.0 > > However, I do not know how to list all the bugs for the package > guix-patches that matches the usertag reviewed-looks-good. Anyway! Clicking on an entry in the above list shows them; I'm sure we could define a procedure to directly show the bugs associated with a usertag, which would be useful. > I think that the usertag =E2=80=99reviewed=E2=80=99 is a good idea. That= would be a > very good start. Then if it helps, we could add other usertags as > reviewed-julia for patches that the Julia team can merge. +1 for the 'reviewed' usertag (using the 'guix' user). > Discussing about idea, would it be possible that the QA infrastructure > automatically send a message to Debbugs for tagging? For example, the > usertag =E2=80=99qa-ok=E2=80=99 or whatever other meaningful name. :-) +1 for that as well, maybe 'qa-passed'. --=20 Thanks, Maxim