From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Ghc and profile creation bug
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 18:13:30 +0200
Message-ID: <87iod4kllh.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20150409193851.GA14838@debian>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53189)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YgbYm-0005gd-8g
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:13:37 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YgbYi-0002NJ-OW
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:13:36 -0400
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:33995)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1YgbYi-0002NF-LJ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:13:32 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20150409193851.GA14838@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Thu,
	9 Apr 2015 21:38:51 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> even after "make distclean; ./configure; make install", I obtain the foll=
owing
> with c833ab5 (and before):
>
> $ guix package -n -u

[...]

> In guix/scripts/package.scm:
> 1002: 6 [#<procedure 3149870 at guix/scripts/package.scm:991:4 ()>]
>  837: 5 [process-actions (# # # # ...)]
> In guix/store.scm:
>  977: 4 [run-with-store # ...]
> In guix/profiles.scm:
>  523: 3 [#<procedure 3d1ecf0 at guix/profiles.scm:523:2 (state)> #]
>  527: 2 [#<procedure 3cf5270 at guix/profiles.scm:523:2 (t-57033)> #]
>  411: 1 [ghc-package-cache-file #<<manifest> entries: (# # # # ...)>]
> In unknown file:
>    ?: 0 [scm-error misc-error #f ...]
>
> ERROR: In procedure scm-error:
> ERROR: No variable named ghc in #<interface (gnu packages haskell) 32fc48=
0>

I can=E2=80=99t reproduce it but Ricardo has the same problem, also after h=
aving
used =E2=80=9Cmake install.=E2=80=9D

I suspect an issue with .go/.scm timestamps, like the installed .go
having a newer mtime than the .scm even though it=E2=80=99s actually out of
sync.  Could you try to investigate in that direction?

TIA,
Ludo=E2=80=99.