Ludovic Courtès (2015-08-26 14:14 +0300) wrote:

> Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès (2015-08-18 17:17 +0300) wrote:
>>
[...]
>>> Also, what about suggesting or even defining a key binding for this one?
>>> It sounds very useful.
>>
>> There is an example of defining a key binding for a command in this
>> section.  As for the real defining, not sure if it is worth, but yeah,
>> why not.  We may define 'guix-minor-mode', for example, with
>> guix-specific key bindings.  But I don't know what bindings to use:
>> 'geiser-mode' already binds many commands to [C-c …].  Perhaps to put
>> the additional keys in [C-c g …]?
>
> Yes, ‘guix-minor-mode’ and C-c g both sound like good ideas to me.

Eventually I named it ‘guix-devel-mode’, and I made it enabled by
default (in "emacs/guix-init.el"), as it just provides some keys and
won't do any harm.  Is it OK?

As for the keys, I put them in [C-c .] "group", because according to
(info "(elisp) Key Binding Conventions"), [C-c <letter>] bindings are
reserved for users.  Do you have other suggestions for the keys?